And yet it's them feminists whine about, not non-entities like you.
Why? Because people who claim that the war in Ukraine is the fault of women and was started by Lithuania will never get mainstream support and therefore are no threat to anyone.
Traditionalists, on the other hand, have 250,000 years of history backing them up, as well as every successful civilization in human history.
Because if you want to create a false narrative, you set up a dichotomy between two positions that benefit you. See also LGBT vs Gender Critical.
By that logic, let's go back to typewriters. Let's use candles instead of lightbulbs. History doesn't make something good. People used candles for centuries, but the lightbulb is superior.
Because if you want to create a false narrative, you set up a dichotomy between two positions that benefit you.
Quite amazing that they manage to control the mind of everyone except you. And for 250,000 years as well!
By that logic, let's go back to typewriters. Let's use candles instead of lightbulbs.
What a stupid argument. If you're going to compare technologies to social institutions, you're even more absurd than I thought. Society existed long before either existed, and will continue for long after. It can survive without either. Society cannot survive without traditiionalism, but it has done quite well without your sperging, thank you very much.
People used candles for centuries, but the lightbulb is superior.
Literally nothing that you say could not be said by a left-wing, woke female-to-trans.
Why don't you even bother checking if your retarded points can be refuted with a 5 second web search before you vomit them all over? I know you have nothing better to do than bitching and whining on the internet so why don't you at least do it better?
When you like something: it's a genuine hitpiece.
When you don't like something: it's a feint to make someone appear not controlled opposition.
How can someone even reason with that? It's like the people who say the moon landing was faked, and then say: of course there's no evidence, they destroyed all the evidence I'm totally sure once existed!
Did she? Ignoring that helped the party hold power in those regions, it didn't damage the party or result in feminists losing any power, while confronting it would have lost them tons of votes from Muslims as well as strengthening the right with the possibility of Labour losing more seats.
Instead, she ignored it and has a seat in the shadow Cabinet, and could have real influence in the next government because BoJo's replacement will lose a general election. A few people were hurt, but I wouldn't worry about it. I'm sure she has very sadistic plans for the men who don't leave the country when she gets into the government. She'll avenge those victims by doubling the male suicide rate and laughing about it. (again.)
Yes. And that despite the fact that you always say that "theeey would never agree to harm to theeeeeiir own!!!!!!" Remember, that was your justification for cheering forcing vaccines on young girls.
Ignoring that helped the party hold power in those regions, it didn't damage the party or result in feminists losing any power,
You're almost getting it. It's about political power, not about the best interests of the womans.
A few people were hurt, but I wouldn't worry about it
Wait, so you're fine with 14,000 young girls in Rotherham being brutally raped for years.
I'm sure she has very sadistic plans for the men who don't leave the country when she gets into the government.
Do tell me.
She'll avenge those victims by doubling the male suicide rate and laughing about it. (again.)
Yes, feminists love 'tradcucks'.
Of course they do, they let women walk all over them.
And yet it's them feminists whine about, not non-entities like you.
Why? Because people who claim that the war in Ukraine is the fault of women and was started by Lithuania will never get mainstream support and therefore are no threat to anyone.
Traditionalists, on the other hand, have 250,000 years of history backing them up, as well as every successful civilization in human history.
Because if you want to create a false narrative, you set up a dichotomy between two positions that benefit you. See also LGBT vs Gender Critical.
By that logic, let's go back to typewriters. Let's use candles instead of lightbulbs. History doesn't make something good. People used candles for centuries, but the lightbulb is superior.
Quite amazing that they manage to control the mind of everyone except you. And for 250,000 years as well!
What a stupid argument. If you're going to compare technologies to social institutions, you're even more absurd than I thought. Society existed long before either existed, and will continue for long after. It can survive without either. Society cannot survive without traditiionalism, but it has done quite well without your sperging, thank you very much.
Literally nothing that you say could not be said by a left-wing, woke female-to-trans.
What a stud.
Elon will repopulate the Earth with autistic spazzes.
Autism Master Race (this is what Shane Black actually believes)
If so, he needs to find better taste in women than his ex, what was her name, Grease?
Grease and Turd, real pickers there.
Mr "muh birth rates" seems to be immune to being targeted by feminists.
Almost like they're on the same team.
Here are examples of feminists bitching about him:
https://uk.pcmag.com/opinion/137656/elon-musk-is-a-misogynist-and-it-matters
https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-explains-why-he-follows-zero-women-twitter-506426
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/23/us-billionaires-taxes-elon-musk-week-in-patriarchy
Why don't you even bother checking if your retarded points can be refuted with a 5 second web search before you vomit them all over? I know you have nothing better to do than bitching and whining on the internet so why don't you at least do it better?
One of those is from 6 years ago.
You have to at least publish some hits against controlled opposition, otherwise it's too obvious.
So they've hated him for a long time then
When you like something: it's a genuine hitpiece. When you don't like something: it's a feint to make someone appear not controlled opposition.
How can someone even reason with that? It's like the people who say the moon landing was faked, and then say: of course there's no evidence, they destroyed all the evidence I'm totally sure once existed!
So who's on your team? I thought you were about to seize power in the UK?
Probably nobody. Everyone I support turns out to be a traitor.
Maybe they just never swore fealty to you.
No, just to women.
Then your hero and future PM Jess Philips betrayed women by shilling for the Rotherham stuff.
Did she? Ignoring that helped the party hold power in those regions, it didn't damage the party or result in feminists losing any power, while confronting it would have lost them tons of votes from Muslims as well as strengthening the right with the possibility of Labour losing more seats.
Instead, she ignored it and has a seat in the shadow Cabinet, and could have real influence in the next government because BoJo's replacement will lose a general election. A few people were hurt, but I wouldn't worry about it. I'm sure she has very sadistic plans for the men who don't leave the country when she gets into the government. She'll avenge those victims by doubling the male suicide rate and laughing about it. (again.)
Yes. And that despite the fact that you always say that "theeey would never agree to harm to theeeeeiir own!!!!!!" Remember, that was your justification for cheering forcing vaccines on young girls.
You're almost getting it. It's about political power, not about the best interests of the womans.
Wait, so you're fine with 14,000 young girls in Rotherham being brutally raped for years.
Do tell me.
That doesn't avenge the victims.