It need not be a net increase in taxation, which will not be very usefully spent by politicians. But it's possible to reduce the tax burden on families with children while single men pay their fair share, which should encourage families and reduce bachelorhood.
Nay, son. Having children is necessary for the survival of the community, so those who do not have them should be taxed in order to make it more affordable for those who do their fair share for this survival of the community.
So how high should a bachelor tax be? You said the Nazis put it at 5%, but that sounds rather low to me.
Anyway, you better learn to live with it. Carrie has decreed it, and she'll soon blackmail leaders in Europe and have the ECB bribe them to adopt the same policy.
Good.
What possible justification could there be for forcing men to pay even more when they are already the only net contributors to the system?
It need not be a net increase in taxation, which will not be very usefully spent by politicians. But it's possible to reduce the tax burden on families with children while single men pay their fair share, which should encourage families and reduce bachelorhood.
Or you could have massive immigration.
Having children is a choice. A choice that you should pay for, not expect people you don't like to be taxed to pay for.
Nay, son. Having children is necessary for the survival of the community, so those who do not have them should be taxed in order to make it more affordable for those who do their fair share for this survival of the community.
So how high should a bachelor tax be? You said the Nazis put it at 5%, but that sounds rather low to me.
Anyway, you better learn to live with it. Carrie has decreed it, and she'll soon blackmail leaders in Europe and have the ECB bribe them to adopt the same policy.