As such this subreddit does not allow anti-abortion sentiments. They are abhorrent and inhumane. The belief that people should be downtrodden, unhappy, poor and grow up in misery is unacceptable.
In addition to that: The only sane word to describe those who would subject a 10 year old girl to this abuse, who would refuse her to terminate this pregancy is monstrous. They are monsters. Their rigid, counterfactual beliefs which defy all fact-based reasoning in order to promote an extremist view which brooks no deviation from a hardline stance, which would seek post-hoc justifications for a nonsensical and damaging policy causes harm. It is in no way a moral or defensible position.
This is not a healthy person, this is not a rational person, this is a mentally deranged child who believes people are objects. This person is likely allowed to vote.
I’m not sure if it’s fake or not. I can’t find any indication that it is. But I can’t find many details corroborating the story either.
It’s just a “10 year old girl”. No indication of what city she’s from or other details.
Even if it is true… so what? It’s a tragedy but it’s a very rare tragedy. The media and left act like this is PROOF that RvW shouldn’t be overturned.
What they are doing is taking advantage of the availability heuristic. Highlight the very rare rape case in a 10 year old and the normies think it happens more often than it does.
FWIW, the Wikipedia page has a subsection for 10 year olds on the "youngest pregnancies" page.
While not impossible for a 10 year old to get pregnant, it would certainly be major major major news. And, importantly:
A 10 year old being pregnant is only possible if someone has committed a heinous crime. Let's focus more on the rape of a 9/10 year old, if it's true. Someone needs to go to jail.
But again, it's likely not true. Should have gone with a 13 year old for their fantasy story.
Ignoring everything wrong with the very concept of a prepubescent girl being "pregnant" (hello trust the science crowd), the fact is, she isn't getting an abortion because she wants to keep her hedonistic lifestyle going, which is what 99% of abortions are.
It's disgusting that they see this event as a win for them. They don't give a shit about this girl, they just want to use her to get what they want, trying to get victim points as if every pregnancy is the same thing that happened to her. 99% of the people who advocate for baby killings are adults who willingly have unprotected sex knowing what would happen. Not even remotely comparable.
Make it illegal. Not one jury in the western world would convict the ten year old. I don't think even the corrupt cops would bother to make the arrest, let alone a judge take the case and a prosecutor going along with it.
Murder is illegal. People are still "allowed" to defend themselves, to the death if need be, when the danger presented to them is sufficient. Even in a whacked out world where people thought this DID happen, and the kid for some reason wasn't reported to a hospital that would have applied immediate countermeasures, it passed the THREE MONTHS that was the default prior to RvW, AND they lived in a deeply conservative state that didn't just extend the law state-side since it is now a states-rights issue, obviously the life of the older child would be at risk, and if killing the baby is murder, that would actually be a justified self defense clause.
This is not a healthy person, this is not a rational person, this is a mentally deranged child who believes people are objects. This person is likely allowed to vote.
I’m not sure if it’s fake or not. I can’t find any indication that it is. But I can’t find many details corroborating the story either.
It’s just a “10 year old girl”. No indication of what city she’s from or other details.
Even if it is true… so what? It’s a tragedy but it’s a very rare tragedy. The media and left act like this is PROOF that RvW shouldn’t be overturned.
What they are doing is taking advantage of the availability heuristic. Highlight the very rare rape case in a 10 year old and the normies think it happens more often than it does.
FWIW, the Wikipedia page has a subsection for 10 year olds on the "youngest pregnancies" page.
While not impossible for a 10 year old to get pregnant, it would certainly be major major major news. And, importantly:
A 10 year old being pregnant is only possible if someone has committed a heinous crime. Let's focus more on the rape of a 9/10 year old, if it's true. Someone needs to go to jail.
But again, it's likely not true. Should have gone with a 13 year old for their fantasy story.
Ignoring everything wrong with the very concept of a prepubescent girl being "pregnant" (hello trust the science crowd), the fact is, she isn't getting an abortion because she wants to keep her hedonistic lifestyle going, which is what 99% of abortions are.
Abortion isn't birth control.
It's disgusting that they see this event as a win for them. They don't give a shit about this girl, they just want to use her to get what they want, trying to get victim points as if every pregnancy is the same thing that happened to her. 99% of the people who advocate for baby killings are adults who willingly have unprotected sex knowing what would happen. Not even remotely comparable.
On top of that...
Make it illegal. Not one jury in the western world would convict the ten year old. I don't think even the corrupt cops would bother to make the arrest, let alone a judge take the case and a prosecutor going along with it.
Murder is illegal. People are still "allowed" to defend themselves, to the death if need be, when the danger presented to them is sufficient. Even in a whacked out world where people thought this DID happen, and the kid for some reason wasn't reported to a hospital that would have applied immediate countermeasures, it passed the THREE MONTHS that was the default prior to RvW, AND they lived in a deeply conservative state that didn't just extend the law state-side since it is now a states-rights issue, obviously the life of the older child would be at risk, and if killing the baby is murder, that would actually be a justified self defense clause.