If you actually read the article, the inescapable conclusion is that the "nationwide matriculation exam" that was used to determine who got hired is a poor measure of who would be a good teacher. This is proven by the fact that lower-scoring men had superior education outcomes for their students.
The reform that should be done here is to revise the criteria for hiring so that it is based on criteria that optimizes education outcomes. So there should be further study as to which teachers produce the best and worst outcomes, and why, and then those criteria should be used in hiring decisions.
This is proven by the fact that lower-scoring men had superior education outcomes for their students.
Men generally surpass women in wisdom and being able to naturally motivate children (both male & female) to aspirational goals. I don't say that with malice towards women. I say that because it has a track record of being true.
If you actually read the article, the inescapable conclusion is that the "nationwide matriculation exam" that was used to determine who got hired is a poor measure of who would be a good teacher. This is proven by the fact that lower-scoring men had superior education outcomes for their students.
The reform that should be done here is to revise the criteria for hiring so that it is based on criteria that optimizes education outcomes. So there should be further study as to which teachers produce the best and worst outcomes, and why, and then those criteria should be used in hiring decisions.
Men generally surpass women in wisdom and being able to naturally motivate children (both male & female) to aspirational goals. I don't say that with malice towards women. I say that because it has a track record of being true.