I challenge any doctor or retard who thinks they know science to tell me what part of the reproductive process is abortion, and why, if it is a safe and essential procedure that only one in four American women get one? Also the 8th and 14th amendments are completely nullified by allowing abortion practices to be legal. There is no legal argument that abortion is not cruel and unusual punishment, just as there is no legal argument that abortion doesn’t violate the equal protection clause and the concept of human ownership. The paper they claim is “science” never once argues that the fetus is not a living human, they instead argue “pain and viability” which is the most shallow argument alive. There is no such thing as a viable human by their standards, every human has required other humans to exist period. This is not limited to a fetus that requires others for sustenance. In fact viability would argue rationally that any child could be murdered for convenience under the law. Pain is another misnomer, “pain” is entirely irrelevant to living. These are the “top” of our medical community claiming the two determinants of life are the ability to survive independent of another person and the ability to say ow. I’m not joking…..
Wouldn't surprise me if there was number fudging happening somewhere/somehow that meant someone even just mentioning they are considering one will count.
I'd need to actually examine their brief. It could be false in a number of ways.
I see at least five possibilities here:
Polling methodology error - their data sample was women who were seeking an abortion, increasing the odds that they had already had one.
Obfuscation by omission - including spontaneous abortions (more commonly known as miscarriages).
Conflation of unrelated actions - including the use of abortifacient drugs such as Plan B, which does not guarantee that there was a pregnancy to terminate.
Inappropriate use of averaging - my example above; if one hundred women report twenty-five abortions in total but five women had five each, that would be a population aggregate of one in four, but intentionally ignores the possibility that outliers are not outliers but instead the norm.
Islam is right about America. It is utterly and irredeemably corrupt and should be destroyed.
I challenge any doctor or retard who thinks they know science to tell me what part of the reproductive process is abortion, and why, if it is a safe and essential procedure that only one in four American women get one? Also the 8th and 14th amendments are completely nullified by allowing abortion practices to be legal. There is no legal argument that abortion is not cruel and unusual punishment, just as there is no legal argument that abortion doesn’t violate the equal protection clause and the concept of human ownership. The paper they claim is “science” never once argues that the fetus is not a living human, they instead argue “pain and viability” which is the most shallow argument alive. There is no such thing as a viable human by their standards, every human has required other humans to exist period. This is not limited to a fetus that requires others for sustenance. In fact viability would argue rationally that any child could be murdered for convenience under the law. Pain is another misnomer, “pain” is entirely irrelevant to living. These are the “top” of our medical community claiming the two determinants of life are the ability to survive independent of another person and the ability to say ow. I’m not joking…..
I'm guessing one in a hundred get twenty-five instead. I simply do not believe that statistic.
I'm sure the number is inflated with miscarriages or other problems.
Wouldn't surprise me if there was number fudging happening somewhere/somehow that meant someone even just mentioning they are considering one will count.
the national obstetrician association claimed 1 in 4 American women have an abortion by the age of 45 in their brief to the Supreme Court.
I'd need to actually examine their brief. It could be false in a number of ways.
I see at least five possibilities here:
Never assume that these people aren't willing to just tell bald-faced lies.
I’m not saying their claim is factual, just that they claimed it.