Tell me you didn't read Schope without telling me you didn't read Schope. Your materialistic hedonism and TikTok attention span makes you no different than the feminist bugman you claim to oppose. Your high-time preference accelerationism has you marching in lockstep with the progressives into the Landian zombie apocalypse as you bicker with them about irrelevant minutiae.
What on earth are you talking about? I feel like you were trying to sound intellectual and failed at it.
The progressives don't agree with me on anything. They don't want men to be free, they want them enslaved to women. Tradcucks differ solely in the method of enslavement.
I leave the intellectualism to the people much better at it than me. I'm simply a cultured thug. These are pretty basic concepts in dissident politics.
What on earth are you talking about?
Hedonistic materialism resulting in the destruction of societal bonds and an IQ shredder that selects against conciousness to create a zombie apocalypse. If you can't be bothered to read as you have so demonstrated, you aren't going to be able to keep up.
Spez: A good primer on right-wing thought, The Populist Delusion, was published recently. It'll save you about 10,000 pages if you decide to start doing the reading.
I understand what the words mean, I just don't think they make sense together. Anyway, you've made it a little more clear, so I'll try to respond.
Hedonistic materialism just sounds like commie shit. You don't need material goods, you should give those up for the good of society...
What societal bonds exist? Why should I stick to a contract that was long broken by the other party? We have absolutely zero bond to them and I'm perfectly fine with that, as long as we get the chance to sever our ties to them and drop our financial dead weight.
IQ shredder, this is the whole Elon "women control my wealth and can delist my stock whenever they want to bankrupt me" Musk sky is falling conspiracy theory isn't it. That we are living out Idiocracy because those with intellect correctly avoid women because their risk vs benefit analysis hits more red flags than a Chinese military parade. Even if this is the case, the solution isn't to make us shut down our brains, it's to remove the red flags and make it worth it for us, even if personally, nothing would make me even cohabitate with a woman, let alone have children.
The words I used were specifically chosen because they reference deeper concepts from Mises, Francis, Land, and others. That way I don't have to write a short essay like I'm about to do anyways.
If you're not worried about materialism, why are constantly complaining about married women utilizing their husband's resources, which Shope addresses in a way that would surprise if you would actually read it. Also, why do you constantly rail against the traditional view of marriage if you acknowledge the solution is a restoration of patriarchal norms.
If Musk has talked about the IQ shredder, it's because Thiel/Yarvin has introduced him to it. The term originates with Spandrell. It's the idea that cities skim high IQ people from all over the world, then burns as much productivity out of them as possible which prohibits the formation of families. This is best demonstrated by coporations paying women to murder their babies in order to keep them working, although the sheconomy is ultimately an unproductive welfare system but that is a huge digression.
Combine the capitalist IQ shredder with democractic totalitarianism and the competency of power degrades rapidly as the system becomes self-perpetuating, until it eventually ossifies in the form of a literal zombie apocalypse where conciousness itself has been abandoned. The structure of power becomes impossible to dislodge as the system itself instinctively manages its own decay. This comes from The Dark Enlightenment by Nick Land. His solution is to burn through productivity faster to achieve transhumanist technology to rectify the IQ problem, which is basically highly-intelligent Borg zombies. Land's solution has a lot of problems, but Musk seems to be a fan.
Alternatively, one could crush democracy, capitalist oligarchs, the sheconomy, and reduce the complexity of the system while restoring the natural patriarchy to drive towards eudamonia instead of hedonism.
Tell me you didn't read Schope without telling me you didn't read Schope. Your materialistic hedonism and TikTok attention span makes you no different than the feminist bugman you claim to oppose. Your high-time preference accelerationism has you marching in lockstep with the progressives into the Landian zombie apocalypse as you bicker with them about irrelevant minutiae.
What on earth are you talking about? I feel like you were trying to sound intellectual and failed at it.
The progressives don't agree with me on anything. They don't want men to be free, they want them enslaved to women. Tradcucks differ solely in the method of enslavement.
I leave the intellectualism to the people much better at it than me. I'm simply a cultured thug. These are pretty basic concepts in dissident politics.
Hedonistic materialism resulting in the destruction of societal bonds and an IQ shredder that selects against conciousness to create a zombie apocalypse. If you can't be bothered to read as you have so demonstrated, you aren't going to be able to keep up.
Spez: A good primer on right-wing thought, The Populist Delusion, was published recently. It'll save you about 10,000 pages if you decide to start doing the reading.
I understand what the words mean, I just don't think they make sense together. Anyway, you've made it a little more clear, so I'll try to respond.
Hedonistic materialism just sounds like commie shit. You don't need material goods, you should give those up for the good of society...
What societal bonds exist? Why should I stick to a contract that was long broken by the other party? We have absolutely zero bond to them and I'm perfectly fine with that, as long as we get the chance to sever our ties to them and drop our financial dead weight.
IQ shredder, this is the whole Elon "women control my wealth and can delist my stock whenever they want to bankrupt me" Musk sky is falling conspiracy theory isn't it. That we are living out Idiocracy because those with intellect correctly avoid women because their risk vs benefit analysis hits more red flags than a Chinese military parade. Even if this is the case, the solution isn't to make us shut down our brains, it's to remove the red flags and make it worth it for us, even if personally, nothing would make me even cohabitate with a woman, let alone have children.
The words I used were specifically chosen because they reference deeper concepts from Mises, Francis, Land, and others. That way I don't have to write a short essay like I'm about to do anyways.
If you're not worried about materialism, why are constantly complaining about married women utilizing their husband's resources, which Shope addresses in a way that would surprise if you would actually read it. Also, why do you constantly rail against the traditional view of marriage if you acknowledge the solution is a restoration of patriarchal norms.
If Musk has talked about the IQ shredder, it's because Thiel/Yarvin has introduced him to it. The term originates with Spandrell. It's the idea that cities skim high IQ people from all over the world, then burns as much productivity out of them as possible which prohibits the formation of families. This is best demonstrated by coporations paying women to murder their babies in order to keep them working, although the sheconomy is ultimately an unproductive welfare system but that is a huge digression.
Combine the capitalist IQ shredder with democractic totalitarianism and the competency of power degrades rapidly as the system becomes self-perpetuating, until it eventually ossifies in the form of a literal zombie apocalypse where conciousness itself has been abandoned. The structure of power becomes impossible to dislodge as the system itself instinctively manages its own decay. This comes from The Dark Enlightenment by Nick Land. His solution is to burn through productivity faster to achieve transhumanist technology to rectify the IQ problem, which is basically highly-intelligent Borg zombies. Land's solution has a lot of problems, but Musk seems to be a fan.
Alternatively, one could crush democracy, capitalist oligarchs, the sheconomy, and reduce the complexity of the system while restoring the natural patriarchy to drive towards eudamonia instead of hedonism.