The words I used were specifically chosen because they reference deeper concepts from Mises, Francis, Land, and others. That way I don't have to write a short essay like I'm about to do anyways.
If you're not worried about materialism, why are constantly complaining about married women utilizing their husband's resources, which Shope addresses in a way that would surprise if you would actually read it. Also, why do you constantly rail against the traditional view of marriage if you acknowledge the solution is a restoration of patriarchal norms.
If Musk has talked about the IQ shredder, it's because Thiel/Yarvin has introduced him to it. The term originates with Spandrell. It's the idea that cities skim high IQ people from all over the world, then burns as much productivity out of them as possible which prohibits the formation of families. This is best demonstrated by coporations paying women to murder their babies in order to keep them working, although the sheconomy is ultimately an unproductive welfare system but that is a huge digression.
Combine the capitalist IQ shredder with democractic totalitarianism and the competency of power degrades rapidly as the system becomes self-perpetuating, until it eventually ossifies in the form of a literal zombie apocalypse where conciousness itself has been abandoned. The structure of power becomes impossible to dislodge as the system itself instinctively manages its own decay. This comes from The Dark Enlightenment by Nick Land. His solution is to burn through productivity faster to achieve transhumanist technology to rectify the IQ problem, which is basically highly-intelligent Borg zombies. Land's solution has a lot of problems, but Musk seems to be a fan.
Alternatively, one could crush democracy, capitalist oligarchs, the sheconomy, and reduce the complexity of the system while restoring the natural patriarchy to drive towards eudamonia instead of hedonism.
The words I used were specifically chosen because they reference deeper concepts from Mises, Francis, Land, and others. That way I don't have to write a short essay like I'm about to do anyways.
If you're not worried about materialism, why are constantly complaining about married women utilizing their husband's resources, which Shope addresses in a way that would surprise if you would actually read it. Also, why do you constantly rail against the traditional view of marriage if you acknowledge the solution is a restoration of patriarchal norms.
If Musk has talked about the IQ shredder, it's because Thiel/Yarvin has introduced him to it. The term originates with Spandrell. It's the idea that cities skim high IQ people from all over the world, then burns as much productivity out of them as possible which prohibits the formation of families. This is best demonstrated by coporations paying women to murder their babies in order to keep them working, although the sheconomy is ultimately an unproductive welfare system but that is a huge digression.
Combine the capitalist IQ shredder with democractic totalitarianism and the competency of power degrades rapidly as the system becomes self-perpetuating, until it eventually ossifies in the form of a literal zombie apocalypse where conciousness itself has been abandoned. The structure of power becomes impossible to dislodge as the system itself instinctively manages its own decay. This comes from The Dark Enlightenment by Nick Land. His solution is to burn through productivity faster to achieve transhumanist technology to rectify the IQ problem, which is basically highly-intelligent Borg zombies. Land's solution has a lot of problems, but Musk seems to be a fan.
Alternatively, one could crush democracy, capitalist oligarchs, the sheconomy, and reduce the complexity of the system while restoring the natural patriarchy to drive towards eudamonia instead of hedonism.