That is pretty incoherent. They destroyed the insitution of marriage in order to protect the marriage racket?
The traditional position is that women are subsumed into their husband and their children in order to find fullfilment. Schopenhauer's Of Women is a good start for this, and an audio version.
Marriage is only important to tradcucks to the extent that it produces children.
If the man never sees them and pays her thousands a month in alimony, that's fine. It means the state doesn't have to provide for her or the kids.
That's why they wanted porn banned. That's why they had circumcision normalized. It's all to reduce the possibility that you can control your urges and avoid having kids.
Tell me you didn't read Schope without telling me you didn't read Schope. Your materialistic hedonism and TikTok attention span makes you no different than the feminist bugman you claim to oppose. Your high-time preference accelerationism has you marching in lockstep with the progressives into the Landian zombie apocalypse as you bicker with them about irrelevant minutiae.
What on earth are you talking about? I feel like you were trying to sound intellectual and failed at it.
The progressives don't agree with me on anything. They don't want men to be free, they want them enslaved to women. Tradcucks differ solely in the method of enslavement.
I leave the intellectualism to the people much better at it than me. I'm simply a cultured thug. These are pretty basic concepts in dissident politics.
What on earth are you talking about?
Hedonistic materialism resulting in the destruction of societal bonds and an IQ shredder that selects against conciousness to create a zombie apocalypse. If you can't be bothered to read as you have so demonstrated, you aren't going to be able to keep up.
Spez: A good primer on right-wing thought, The Populist Delusion, was published recently. It'll save you about 10,000 pages if you decide to start doing the reading.
That is pretty incoherent. They destroyed the insitution of marriage in order to protect the marriage racket?
The traditional position is that women are subsumed into their husband and their children in order to find fullfilment. Schopenhauer's Of Women is a good start for this, and an audio version.
The solution is regime change. Clear them out!
Marriage is only important to tradcucks to the extent that it produces children.
If the man never sees them and pays her thousands a month in alimony, that's fine. It means the state doesn't have to provide for her or the kids.
That's why they wanted porn banned. That's why they had circumcision normalized. It's all to reduce the possibility that you can control your urges and avoid having kids.
Tell me you didn't read Schope without telling me you didn't read Schope. Your materialistic hedonism and TikTok attention span makes you no different than the feminist bugman you claim to oppose. Your high-time preference accelerationism has you marching in lockstep with the progressives into the Landian zombie apocalypse as you bicker with them about irrelevant minutiae.
What on earth are you talking about? I feel like you were trying to sound intellectual and failed at it.
The progressives don't agree with me on anything. They don't want men to be free, they want them enslaved to women. Tradcucks differ solely in the method of enslavement.
I leave the intellectualism to the people much better at it than me. I'm simply a cultured thug. These are pretty basic concepts in dissident politics.
Hedonistic materialism resulting in the destruction of societal bonds and an IQ shredder that selects against conciousness to create a zombie apocalypse. If you can't be bothered to read as you have so demonstrated, you aren't going to be able to keep up.
Spez: A good primer on right-wing thought, The Populist Delusion, was published recently. It'll save you about 10,000 pages if you decide to start doing the reading.