Yeah, the propaganda term got out because the republicans didn't name the bill, and instead we (the dissident right) had to come out with the term "Anti-Groomer Bill" in response.
Both "Anti-Groomer" and "Don't Say Gay" are propaganda terms.
I mean, maybe? Only idiots believed "don't say gay" was an accurate description of anything. The media never told their own useful idiots that it was accurate.
It's like when someone says the COVID vaccine prevents infection. No one ever said that. Not Pfizer, not Fauci, not Biden, not HHS, not WHO, not CDC, not MSNBC. I've literally argued with someone on reddit who told me that, and I read his own article back to him and showed that no one ever said that the vaccine prevented infection, and explicitly said that it didn't.
The meme was in the framing of the concept and nothing more. MSNBC """"admitted"""" that the vaccine didn't prevent infection, because they never said it in the first place. It was just assumed by NPCs based off of framing alone.
This bill was no different. Leftists aren't even living in a world that the media constructs for them. It's entirely in their own head based off of the media's framing.
Fun fact: In my country they fucked up the message really, really bad. The whole fauxcine program is called Tečka - period, as in after a sentence. "To make a period after X" is a common expression meaning "to declare X over and stop talking about it". So we're "making a period" after The Coof, in fact we've made multiple already. The program's been running since early 2021 with zero effect, but the name is still there, so when someone comes at me with this "noone ever said it prevented infection/transmission" I can just ask them how many periods they've already made and it shuts them right the fuck up.
I'm not familiar with this period expression. All I can tell you is what I've seen in the Anglosphere is that any of the "experts" or official government sources specifically avoided saying that it prevented infection. They framed the conversation as if it did, but when pressed they'd talk about the "reduced viral load", and "lessened chance of transmission", and " fewer hospitalizations", and "rarity of 'breakthrough' cases", etc.
Over and over, the truth was that it never immunized anyone from the virus, they just refused to say that explicitly, and talked around it.
Perhaps my issue is that I'm so jaded with the press, that I don't see them as different from marketing departments, considering I've seen how marketing departments regard journalism.
Literally, 100% of the time, they regard journalism as "unintended advertising", and they treat it as that. I think journalism has now fully adopted that. I hate to say I agree with Rupert Murdoch, but I think all real/good news is fully pay-walled. Everything else is propaganda. I think free, objective, news is now fully impossible.
"Brand Ambassadors", could be better described as "Corporate Subversives". It's literally their job to subtly name-drop their sponsors, and even move conversations into the advertising lines and objectives that they've been given by brands. It's not like a dude with a logo on his shirt anymore. Their objective is to push the brand and it's very subtle advertising during all press conferences and public interviews.
For example, let's say you're a brand ambassador for ABC Financing, some sort of loan company, and you're a badminton player. Let's say their slogan is: "Peace of Mind".
If, for some reason, you were at a Burger King when an armed robbery took place, and a journalist is asking you questions about the armed robbery, it's your job to say something like, "Well, I had just gotten a burger, and about to walk out of the store to get a car loan, when this dude just busts in with a gun! I was definitely scared, I kinda lost my peace of mind when I see stuff like that happening." And while you're being filmed, you bet your ass you're wearing your brands colors even if you don't mention the brand, or say it's name, or have it's logo visible.
Fully subversive.
That's how bad the shilling really is. I've heard marketing go into detail about it, not just the brand ambassadors, but fucking everyone. This is why they are so obsessive about social media. It's their fucking warzone. They are advertising and they aren't even telling you what they are advertising.
100%. We are definitely in a PR/propaganda war, and so far the left/woke faction has had the advantage because they control at least 90% of all media and own the universities and their pipelines into newsrooms and K-12 teaching.. However, the forces of reason (it's way more now than just "the right") have the advantage with memes since the left can't meme.
Edit/P.S.
Look at what happened with the White House propaganda team and how their "ultra MAGA" idea was immediately turned against them, like Emperor Trump became another rallying point.
I mean, I don't see what the "admission" here is.
Yeah, the propaganda term got out because the republicans didn't name the bill, and instead we (the dissident right) had to come out with the term "Anti-Groomer Bill" in response.
Both "Anti-Groomer" and "Don't Say Gay" are propaganda terms.
I mean, maybe? Only idiots believed "don't say gay" was an accurate description of anything. The media never told their own useful idiots that it was accurate.
It's like when someone says the COVID vaccine prevents infection. No one ever said that. Not Pfizer, not Fauci, not Biden, not HHS, not WHO, not CDC, not MSNBC. I've literally argued with someone on reddit who told me that, and I read his own article back to him and showed that no one ever said that the vaccine prevented infection, and explicitly said that it didn't.
The meme was in the framing of the concept and nothing more. MSNBC """"admitted"""" that the vaccine didn't prevent infection, because they never said it in the first place. It was just assumed by NPCs based off of framing alone.
This bill was no different. Leftists aren't even living in a world that the media constructs for them. It's entirely in their own head based off of the media's framing.
Nigga what. https://files.catbox.moe/8t71ke.mp4
Fun fact: In my country they fucked up the message really, really bad. The whole fauxcine program is called Tečka - period, as in after a sentence. "To make a period after X" is a common expression meaning "to declare X over and stop talking about it". So we're "making a period" after The Coof, in fact we've made multiple already. The program's been running since early 2021 with zero effect, but the name is still there, so when someone comes at me with this "noone ever said it prevented infection/transmission" I can just ask them how many periods they've already made and it shuts them right the fuck up.
I'm not clicking on your random file, sorry.
I'm not familiar with this period expression. All I can tell you is what I've seen in the Anglosphere is that any of the "experts" or official government sources specifically avoided saying that it prevented infection. They framed the conversation as if it did, but when pressed they'd talk about the "reduced viral load", and "lessened chance of transmission", and " fewer hospitalizations", and "rarity of 'breakthrough' cases", etc.
Over and over, the truth was that it never immunized anyone from the virus, they just refused to say that explicitly, and talked around it.
Perhaps my issue is that I'm so jaded with the press, that I don't see them as different from marketing departments, considering I've seen how marketing departments regard journalism.
Literally, 100% of the time, they regard journalism as "unintended advertising", and they treat it as that. I think journalism has now fully adopted that. I hate to say I agree with Rupert Murdoch, but I think all real/good news is fully pay-walled. Everything else is propaganda. I think free, objective, news is now fully impossible.
"Brand Ambassadors", could be better described as "Corporate Subversives". It's literally their job to subtly name-drop their sponsors, and even move conversations into the advertising lines and objectives that they've been given by brands. It's not like a dude with a logo on his shirt anymore. Their objective is to push the brand and it's very subtle advertising during all press conferences and public interviews.
For example, let's say you're a brand ambassador for ABC Financing, some sort of loan company, and you're a badminton player. Let's say their slogan is: "Peace of Mind".
If, for some reason, you were at a Burger King when an armed robbery took place, and a journalist is asking you questions about the armed robbery, it's your job to say something like, "Well, I had just gotten a burger, and about to walk out of the store to get a car loan, when this dude just busts in with a gun! I was definitely scared, I kinda lost my peace of mind when I see stuff like that happening." And while you're being filmed, you bet your ass you're wearing your brands colors even if you don't mention the brand, or say it's name, or have it's logo visible.
Fully subversive.
That's how bad the shilling really is. I've heard marketing go into detail about it, not just the brand ambassadors, but fucking everyone. This is why they are so obsessive about social media. It's their fucking warzone. They are advertising and they aren't even telling you what they are advertising.
100%. We are definitely in a PR/propaganda war, and so far the left/woke faction has had the advantage because they control at least 90% of all media and own the universities and their pipelines into newsrooms and K-12 teaching.. However, the forces of reason (it's way more now than just "the right") have the advantage with memes since the left can't meme.
Edit/P.S.
Look at what happened with the White House propaganda team and how their "ultra MAGA" idea was immediately turned against them, like Emperor Trump became another rallying point.