You cited Scalia who said you must understand the verbiage in it’s [sic] time.
Stop you right there. I cited Scalia who pointed out, contrary to your claims, that it is about the original public meaning, and not the original intent.
We’re done here
We were done a few comments ago, you just decided to splutter on a bit.
Stop you right there. I cited Scalia who pointed out, contrary to your claims, that it is about the original public meaning, and not the original intent.
We were done a few comments ago, you just decided to splutter on a bit.
You’re proving your knowledge about Scalia is limited to that quote. Try proving you can read more than a paragraph princess.