I mean, I think a man should have rights when it comes to explicit baby trapping, such as when a woman sucks his dick, spits into a turkey baster, and blasts it up her vagina, which has actually happened in a somewhat famous court case. [the man lost]

In those malicious cases, I think the welfare of the child is of lesser importance than having a public policy that does not reward such malicious behavior. In other words: the principle of not allowing an evil woman to reap rewards, is more important than the child victim of that woman getting some indirect benefit from the "child support" payments his mother would spend almost entirely on herself anyway.

But outside of rare cases where the woman basically steals or misappropriates the dudes cum the man never consented to introducing to her vagina, the child's rights are more important. So, for example, if a woman lies about being on the pill. Too bad. Don't take her word for it. I have had that exact situation happen, and I never trusted the women. I always pulled out. I've had a few women get mad at me over it, too, lol, but idgaf if hoes mad.