"The Supreme Court sharply curtails the authority of the EPA to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions that cause climate change. In a 6-3 ruling, the court sides with conservative states and fossil-fuel companies in adopting a narrow reading of the Clean Air Act."
"The Supreme Court ALLOWS the Biden administration to terminate the controversial Trump-era asylum policy known as "remain in Mexico." Red states argued that Biden was obliged to keep the policy, but SCOTUS says in a 5-4 ruling that the administration can end it."
Not produced, at least according to the ND health officials.
If there is a compelling interest in requiring vaccines, I disagree. Mind you, I don't think that there is, because here, they do not actually require COVID vaccines for health workers - they just use masks and test a lot. But suppose that a vaccine was actually necessary to protect the health of workers, then it is fine with me.
Violations of bodily autonomy when it comes to medical treatment and violation of religious freedom when it comes to fetal cells are never justifiable.
The New York healthcare law is just like the federal mandate for federal workers/contractors and the mandates for the military.
There is no option given to test and mask.
You are forced to take the vaccine or you are just fired.
These are disgustingly tyrannical laws.
For not granting cert to these kind of cases, Barrett, Kavanaugh and Roberts rightfully belong on the bottom 3 of the Republican Justice tier list.
I disagree. The state has more authority than the federal government has over contractors, which does not mean that it necessarily passes constitutional muster.
This was a very odd Americanism. Because basically everywhere else, if you had a previous infection, that would count as protection. Only in America did they say: you have to get n vaccines as well.
I agree, I am just not sure if they are unconstitutional. If you asks me, yes I would like them to be, but I also don't want to be like the left that does not know to distinguish between what it considers desirable and what is in the C.
Even state mandates are unconstitutional as since there are no religious exemptions provided, it violates the first amendment.
Leftists try to use Jacobson vs Mass as justification but that case only involved a fine for not taking a vaccine.
It is really not that difficult to pass a ruling that these tyrannical mandates are unconstitutional.
Isn't a fine considered more punitive than loss of a job or being prohibited from entering restaurants in law? Certainly, it requires more due process.
Probably not. But the job of judges is to interpret the constitution faithfully, not work hard to arrive at a result that you - or I - find pleasing, right?