Of the five judges overturning Roe, Clarence Thomas is receiving most hate on social media - even though Alito wrote the opinion.
If you're going to call anyone an Uncle Tom for opposing abortion, shouldn't you be attacking Barrett? I mean, it makes no sense, but it makes more sense than "THE BLACK GUY WAS NOT OBEDIENT ENOUGH, THAT UNCLE TOM"!
They always hated Clarence Thomas the most because he is a Black conservative.
The left thinks they own all minorities.
They are also seething that Clarence Thomas's concurrence in the Dobbs case talks about potentially re-assessing the gay marriage precedent(Obergefell v Hobbes) and unrestricted birth control precedent (Griswold v Connecticut ) and maybe even overturning them.
The overturning of those two cases sadly won't happen because Roberts, and Gorsuch won't ever go for it.
Gorsuch in the Bostock case shows us that he will never overturn when it comes to these two cases.
Roberts didn't even overturn Roe so he clearly won't be overturning Griswold or Obergefell.
They always hated Clarence Thomas the most because he is a Black conservative.
Of course, but it surprised me how much hatred he got in this particular case. I would expect them to hate on Barrett more.
The left thinks they own all minorities.
I was reading something about Thomas, which said something like "Clarence Thomas opposes affirmative action despite benefiting from it".
So if you 'benefit' from something you did not ask for, you have to do the radical left's bidding in perpetuity.
I'm so glad I have not received this poisoned chalice myself.
Gorsuch in the Bostock case shows us that he will never overturn when it comes to these two cases.
I'm trying to be optimistic. Gorsuch went full retard in that case, but that hinged on the application of the definition of 'sex' IIRC. It does not require him to say that either homosexual marriage or sodomy are protected by any right to 'privacy'.
Roberts didn't even overturn Roe so he clearly won't be overturning Griswold or Obergefell.
Roberts was in the minority in the latter, so there is hope. As for the former, I don't think a case will come that will allow it to be overruled. So basically, it will remain as a zombie precedent that it thoroughly undermined, but without it being overruled entirely.
Of the five judges overturning Roe, Clarence Thomas is receiving most hate on social media - even though Alito wrote the opinion.
If you're going to call anyone an Uncle Tom for opposing abortion, shouldn't you be attacking Barrett? I mean, it makes no sense, but it makes more sense than "THE BLACK GUY WAS NOT OBEDIENT ENOUGH, THAT UNCLE TOM"!
They always hated Clarence Thomas the most because he is a Black conservative.
The left thinks they own all minorities.
They are also seething that Clarence Thomas's concurrence in the Dobbs case talks about potentially re-assessing the gay marriage precedent(Obergefell v Hobbes) and unrestricted birth control precedent (Griswold v Connecticut ) and maybe even overturning them.
The overturning of those two cases sadly won't happen because Roberts, and Gorsuch won't ever go for it.
Gorsuch in the Bostock case shows us that he will never overturn when it comes to these two cases.
Roberts didn't even overturn Roe so he clearly won't be overturning Griswold or Obergefell.
Of course, but it surprised me how much hatred he got in this particular case. I would expect them to hate on Barrett more.
I was reading something about Thomas, which said something like "Clarence Thomas opposes affirmative action despite benefiting from it".
So if you 'benefit' from something you did not ask for, you have to do the radical left's bidding in perpetuity.
I'm so glad I have not received this poisoned chalice myself.
I'm trying to be optimistic. Gorsuch went full retard in that case, but that hinged on the application of the definition of 'sex' IIRC. It does not require him to say that either homosexual marriage or sodomy are protected by any right to 'privacy'.
Roberts was in the minority in the latter, so there is hope. As for the former, I don't think a case will come that will allow it to be overruled. So basically, it will remain as a zombie precedent that it thoroughly undermined, but without it being overruled entirely.
Based and well written reply pilled