“It’s conventional wisdom to say that the court’s decision in Roe caused the polarization over abortion,” said Reva Siegel, a law professor at Yale. “But the court did not cause that polarization. It was the Republican Party’s quest for voters — political party competition — that savaged Roe. Once the attack on Roe was underway, the defense needed to be full tilt in politics as well as in the courts — and in all political arenas, state, local and federal. Because over time the attack on Roe has become more than an attack on abortion; it has become an attack on democracy.”
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
It was 6-3.
I'm talking about the vote to overturn Roe, which the literal Nazi joined but Roberts did not, genius.
No, it was 5-4. Do you not even know that Roberts did not join the majority opinion?
That was the vote on the Missouri Law.
Roberts had a separate decision, where he supported the Missouri Law, but didn't support overturning RvW.