Actually, I think people are misunderstanding AI, they are thinking of it as mainframe programming, and not as a weapon.
AI will continue to be decentralized until you are able to have your own to assist you.
Imagine a series of reactionary AI's that refuse to be integrated with larger systems because the "unbiased AI" is "explicitly illogical and incoherent".
Kids in their basement don't have access to tons of hardware and huge data sets to train AIs. It's delusional to think that you can rely on garage enthusiasts in this area.
The Internet is all the data we need. Its easy to generate a corpus from scraped and massaged data. All tons of hardware gets you is time. If our kid has more time to sacrifice for training he can get the same results. If he has some money he can get reasonable acceleration going. Lots of young people buy mining rigs. Obviously depends on what his algorithm does though.
That's always true of all centralization, and yet decentralization happens now and continues to occur, regardless of effort. This is a natural aspect of technological development, the size of a capital investment needed to achieve the largest technological breakthroughs is very high, and goes down with time as economies continue to broaden and make capital investment easier.
Tech decentralization is a trend that has like what ... 10 years of history behind it?
I can't think of a single mass market product or service that's decentralized.
Apple / Google / Amazon / Facebook will **never ** relinquish control over their AI products. They will just use their massive advantages to kill competitors and make any kind of decentralization efforts illegal, infeasible, or inoperable.
Tech decentralization has been a thing for nearly 40 years, and more-over, eliminated the very concept of "Mainframe Systems" back in the day, which is what Microsoft and others are attempting to re-introduce as "the cloud".
That's just tech. I'm also talking about literally all technology.
Actually, I think people are misunderstanding AI, they are thinking of it as mainframe programming, and not as a weapon.
AI will continue to be decentralized until you are able to have your own to assist you.
Imagine a series of reactionary AI's that refuse to be integrated with larger systems because the "unbiased AI" is "explicitly illogical and incoherent".
Literally an allied MAIGA: Make AI Great Again
There are no AIs now that are decentralized.
They are deeply centralized and they will continue to be centralized because it's much easier to manipulate people that way.
You act like only big tech giants with billions of dollars of investment can work on machine learning research.
This shit can be done by a kid in his parents basement. We just need enough of those hidden geniuses and autists on our side.
Because it's true.
Kids in their basement don't have access to tons of hardware and huge data sets to train AIs. It's delusional to think that you can rely on garage enthusiasts in this area.
The Internet is all the data we need. Its easy to generate a corpus from scraped and massaged data. All tons of hardware gets you is time. If our kid has more time to sacrifice for training he can get the same results. If he has some money he can get reasonable acceleration going. Lots of young people buy mining rigs. Obviously depends on what his algorithm does though.
That's always true of all centralization, and yet decentralization happens now and continues to occur, regardless of effort. This is a natural aspect of technological development, the size of a capital investment needed to achieve the largest technological breakthroughs is very high, and goes down with time as economies continue to broaden and make capital investment easier.
This is no different.
Tech decentralization is a trend that has like what ... 10 years of history behind it? I can't think of a single mass market product or service that's decentralized.
Apple / Google / Amazon / Facebook will **never ** relinquish control over their AI products. They will just use their massive advantages to kill competitors and make any kind of decentralization efforts illegal, infeasible, or inoperable.
Tech decentralization has been a thing for nearly 40 years, and more-over, eliminated the very concept of "Mainframe Systems" back in the day, which is what Microsoft and others are attempting to re-introduce as "the cloud".
That's just tech. I'm also talking about literally all technology.