Not that I went there much anymore, but it seemed like one of the first anti-nonsense subreddits.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (94)
sorted by:
Unfortunate, but the sub wasn't as good as it used to be. The last year or two it had way too many alphabet people trying to justify their degeneracy by complaining about worse degeneracy.
The man hating TERFs migrated to TIA and SJIA when the GC subs got purged. I appreciated the willingness to take on troonery but the threads had a weird mixture of "Muh misogyny" and based comments.
No they don't. Gay culture is fucked, but "ethical homosexuality" isn't an oxymoron. An adult feeling romantic or sexual love for someone of their own sex isn't inherently the product of a lie, and apart from being unable to raise children the resulting lifestyle isn't inherently harmful. A gay man doesn't have to be a promiscuous sodomite.
Depends on what the standard for morality is and if it even exists at all. Problem is, for most of all the situations where there is actual objective morality then it does actually contradict it and it is an oxymoron. But once again, you gotta define your basis for morality to claim that in either direction.
I am not even making an opinion on this topic in this post. Just saying that it isn't as simple as you are acting.
However, I would take issue with that second to last sentence on a separate point but I don't really care enough to argue it lol. That is too long of a discussion to have for this.
No, but that's the way the community develops
Lol all of them, huh?
Straight guys are so pathetic. So constantly desperate to put your deadened circumcised scar tissue inside a woman - sometimes she lets you, sometimes she doesn't, it's her decision and she can and will use it against you.
Then you see other men having sexual pleasure you can't even imagine during male homosexual intercourse, a capability of the male body that any objective analysis (you know, if aliens were studying us or something) would conclude is a product of evolution and a fundamental aspect of male sexuality.
But women don't date bisexual men, so you're even too terrified to take a shower at the gym. So you come online and reassure each other that those grapes are really sour and anyone who eats the sour grapes is a bad person and circumcised PIV sex (at her discretion) is the best.
And don't get me started on the hypocrisy blaming Pride and puberty blockers on homosexual men while straight people kill a million babies every year.
I'm with you on the troons, but most of them are heterosexual men these days. Troons, abortions, incels, simps, you guys are doing just fine as long as you don't fool around with your bros! Lol so sad
Cope
Homosexuality does have an evolutionary purpose. The evolutionary "value" of homosexuals is providing for their heterosexual siblings. That is, evolution deemed you unfit for replication, and thus you exist to enhance the chances of survival of non-defective elements of your genetic line. In the modern context, with the massively reduced risk of child death, that makes you and yours effectively worthless.
Homophobia, like most stigmatization, has evolutionary roots too. Stigmatization exists to avoid associations that negatively impact survival. Disgust, the sentiment most commonly associated with male homosexuality, is an adaptive survival mechanism. It exists to enable disease and pathogen avoidance. Even without the historical context of male homosexuality being deemed unclean and associated with disease for thousands of years, the disgust that enables homophobia is a natural, evolutionary response in the same way that avoiding stepping in dogshit is. Furthermore, avoidance of people who seemingly do not have this adaptive mechanism is itself inline with evolutionary stigmatization.
Nice whataboutism on the abortion though. Most are capable of taking issue with more than one societal ill at a time.
Wait, wait, wait... You're a video game developer? Your success, your contribution to society is measured in the hours you distract young men from actually gainful activities like athletics, entrepreneurship, learning an instrument or a language... And you're going to lecture me on what's good for men. Haha hahahaha ha! Is this real life?!??
Dilate.
You know, when I realized that the left is full of coping retards whose worldview is just confirmation bias, I was hoping that the other side would be different. Instead it's turned out to be exactly the same, with different prejudices.
You are partially correct: I enjoy being able to provide my nieces and nephews with opportunities that their parents can't afford. Statistically my genes are already represented in the new generation.
You are quite retarded, though, to imply that a man's worth is based on reproductive success. If that's the case then some Jamal getting a DNA test on Maury is a better man than you.
Childless men are one of humanity's greatest evolutionary strategies. From the monks who preserved classical knowledge for centuries, to men like Isaac Newton, Nicola Tesla and the Wright brothers. If you type "Western civilization" into Wikipedia, the image for the article is a naked man drawn by a homo, lol. Vitruvian man. I actually expected the 17-foot naked man carved out of marble by the other homo. Let me know if you ever create anything as monumental and enduring as that.
Your evo psych gibberish is hilarious cope. You're talking about evolution based on the obviously false assumption that aversion to homosexuality is a human universal. No research, no critical thought, you literally just made it up to go with what you already believe. So stupid.
Homosexual behavior, not aversion, was commonplace among the ancient Greeks, Romans, Celts, Slavs, etc. Sparta and Thebes based their militaries on it. The universal disgust you describe never existed. You literally made something up and then explained human evolution in terms of the thing you made up. And other retards gave you upvotes for it. The fact that you think statist conditioning to control male sexuality is natural, and spend your precious time defending it, is really sad.
When I was talking about evolution, I wasn't even talking about phenotypic "homosexuality". I was talking about the actual act.
I guess you don't know much about your butt, but you should know that your body doesn't store waste right next to your anus. That section is indeed a conduit for waste some of the time, a much smaller proportion of time than the place where you put your dick is a conduit for bloody chunks of uterine lining.
You can easily learn to voluntarily relax your anus to have anal sex. I know you use the friction against your scar tissue to achieve orgasm; having receptive anal sex is like having an orgasm for the entire time, followed by ten orgasms at once.
If you had a subscription to the right website, I could show you hundreds of examples of men paid to have sex with women on camera, and then paid to gradually explore sex with men. I'll tell you what, straight guys often compare their job to getting fucked in the ass, but I don't think they mean that they had a boner leaking precum the whole time. Then they take money to have sex with women again. It doesn't turn them gay.
There are homosexual men, but the proportion of men capable of enjoying sex with men is much larger. As we've already discussed, you're obviously capable of rationalizing anything you want to believe, so I'm sure you will find reasons to deny yourself sexual pleasure that your ancestors evolved to be capable of. And if that's the case, I guess it's not a big deal that your parents had a doctor cut half the nerve endings off your dick and let the rest turn into a callus.
And it's really fucking funny that we have this global elite, known for psyops and gaslighting, and you think they're glorifying heterosexual men in dresses and drag queen story hour in order to get you to accept homosexual behavior... instead of the opposite.
"Whataboutism" - that's just what hypocrites say when called out, right? If Pride reflects on me, then abortion reflects on you. I'd rather we treat each other as individuals, though.
Lmao what a gay faggot
Seethe