So this is a farmer in Central Kansas (so not quite the same region, but right next door) giving his professional opinion on what happened with the supposed cattle die off. Some TLDR's:
"10,000 dead cattle" was across the entire state, which is utterly trivial in comparison to the 2.5 million heads of cattle in the state.
2,000-3,000 of that was at a handful of feedlots in SW Kansas (around Dodge City and Garden City). Which he admits can be suspicious to the average layman, BUT...
That part of the state is usual dry and has very little humidity, and it had been fairly cool for most of the first part of the year. Then it rained frequently in the span of a few weeks and raised the heat and humidity. There had also been no wind, so the hot air was very stagnant and sitting over the area.
In the wake of a storm that recently rolled through, the heat and humidity increased significantly in a short timespan (the temp went up almost 20F in less than 48 hours).
There had been a heat burst in the area, which is a very localized and extremely rapid increase in heat, which can be extreme heat (over 120+ have been reported before). It happened overnight, when the cattle had already been stressed from a hot day, so they had had no real time to cool off.
Almost all of the deaths were Black Angus cattle, which are normally very vulnerable to heat. This goes doubly so for the ones at the feedlots, as they are fattened up, making them even more vulnerable to the heat than normal.
Is this a typo by any chance? I live in an area where the high/low difference in a 24 hour period regularly exceeds 30F and the highs from day to day can exceed that. The latter isn't all that common but it does happen. I guess my point is that this doesn't seem extreme at all.
Not a typo. And it probably wouldnt be extreme by itself, but it went on top of a perfect storm of secondary issues outlined in the video that made it so that it did become a compounding factor.
EDIT: Another thing to point out is that while the kind of heat we are having right now is within the normal temperature range for summer, it came about a month early. So a lot of people were not ready for it.
I think the idea is the high, low, and average temperature went up by that much, so now the coolest minute of the day is warmer than yesterday's average or the day before's hottest minute.
One of the things that's been bugging me about the circulating lists of food processing plants catching on fire is that I haven't seen any that answer these questions:
Is this historically more than the usual number of fires?
What percentage of food production is represented by these facilities?
How much will this impact the food supply in the near future?
I mean, I don't doubt our would-be Communofascist Overlords are trying to break shit to control it, but I don't want to go full Chicken Little over things that are of little importance in the grand scheme of things.
Food fires are common. Plant shutdowns are common. Usually, the supply chain is in place to make up for these or the impact is minimal because, again, the supply chain can take up the slack after a couple weeks. You might see a "You won't believe what cracked reason why eggs are going up this week!" or "2 injured in fire at food processing facility; delayed production likely to cause minor spike in prices this week."
What you don't normally see are "Small plane crashes into food processing plant, again."
Thing I've been wondering about is the "Atlas Shrugged" scenario where the handful of people who actually know how to run the plant stop giving a shit for whatever reason.
It's probably sucked working at these places for many years/decades, but everyone has their breaking point.
So this is a farmer in Central Kansas (so not quite the same region, but right next door) giving his professional opinion on what happened with the supposed cattle die off. Some TLDR's:
"10,000 dead cattle" was across the entire state, which is utterly trivial in comparison to the 2.5 million heads of cattle in the state.
2,000-3,000 of that was at a handful of feedlots in SW Kansas (around Dodge City and Garden City). Which he admits can be suspicious to the average layman, BUT...
That part of the state is usual dry and has very little humidity, and it had been fairly cool for most of the first part of the year. Then it rained frequently in the span of a few weeks and raised the heat and humidity. There had also been no wind, so the hot air was very stagnant and sitting over the area.
In the wake of a storm that recently rolled through, the heat and humidity increased significantly in a short timespan (the temp went up almost 20F in less than 48 hours).
There had been a heat burst in the area, which is a very localized and extremely rapid increase in heat, which can be extreme heat (over 120+ have been reported before). It happened overnight, when the cattle had already been stressed from a hot day, so they had had no real time to cool off.
Almost all of the deaths were Black Angus cattle, which are normally very vulnerable to heat. This goes doubly so for the ones at the feedlots, as they are fattened up, making them even more vulnerable to the heat than normal.
Is this a typo by any chance? I live in an area where the high/low difference in a 24 hour period regularly exceeds 30F and the highs from day to day can exceed that. The latter isn't all that common but it does happen. I guess my point is that this doesn't seem extreme at all.
Not a typo. And it probably wouldnt be extreme by itself, but it went on top of a perfect storm of secondary issues outlined in the video that made it so that it did become a compounding factor.
EDIT: Another thing to point out is that while the kind of heat we are having right now is within the normal temperature range for summer, it came about a month early. So a lot of people were not ready for it.
I think the idea is the high, low, and average temperature went up by that much, so now the coolest minute of the day is warmer than yesterday's average or the day before's hottest minute.
It's good to get some context around this event.
One of the things that's been bugging me about the circulating lists of food processing plants catching on fire is that I haven't seen any that answer these questions:
Is this historically more than the usual number of fires? What percentage of food production is represented by these facilities? How much will this impact the food supply in the near future?
I mean, I don't doubt our would-be Communofascist Overlords are trying to break shit to control it, but I don't want to go full Chicken Little over things that are of little importance in the grand scheme of things.
Food fires are common. Plant shutdowns are common. Usually, the supply chain is in place to make up for these or the impact is minimal because, again, the supply chain can take up the slack after a couple weeks. You might see a "You won't believe what cracked reason why eggs are going up this week!" or "2 injured in fire at food processing facility; delayed production likely to cause minor spike in prices this week."
What you don't normally see are "Small plane crashes into food processing plant, again."
Thing I've been wondering about is the "Atlas Shrugged" scenario where the handful of people who actually know how to run the plant stop giving a shit for whatever reason.
It's probably sucked working at these places for many years/decades, but everyone has their breaking point.