No, there are not. That's the biggest lie ever sold to human beings. The men are broken simps and the women are psychotic sadists with a superiority complex.
It happened over a hundred years ago. It's like saying you can't elect right-wingers because the Nazis existed. While it's a very obvious sign that feminism is an ideology that will use violence, it's too dated to have relevance to the modern movement of mentally defective sadists.
I don't want them to use violence, because people will be hurt, but nothing would advance the anti-feminist cause more than seeing the evil freaks attacking innocent people.
No, there are not. That's the biggest lie ever sold to human beings. The men are broken simps and the women are psychotic sadists with a superiority complex.
You do not become that by simply calling yourself a feminist. You can be deceived about what 'feminism' is, as I was when I called myself that.
It's like saying you can't elect right-wingers because the Nazis existed.
The Nazis didn't really have much to do with right-wingers, then or now.
While it's a very obvious sign that feminism is an ideology that will use violence,
The problem is that 'ideologies' do not use violence, but people.
I don't want them to use violence, because people will be hurt, but nothing would advance the anti-feminist cause more than seeing the evil freaks attacking innocent people.
Maybe, maybe not. I expected a counter-revolution of sanity after the BLM reign of terror, but none was forthcoming.
I realize that you're trying to defend yourself here, but you weren't misled. Information about feminism is freely available, you just accepted the lies of your captors and went full Stockholm Syndrome.
Yes, people use violence, but some ideologies are more likely to support it than others. Tankies, feminists and Nazi LARPers are the most likely to justify it.
Because the rioting and looting was judged to be by criminals taking advantage of the protests by most normies. The good thing is that the feminists running that racket couldn't keep their hands out of the cookie jar and killed it off anyway.
Feminists can't play that game because they've openly called for violence. Their history is full of violence, and a lot of their side are waiting for the excuse to use it.
No, there are not. That's the biggest lie ever sold to human beings. The men are broken simps and the women are psychotic sadists with a superiority complex.
It happened over a hundred years ago. It's like saying you can't elect right-wingers because the Nazis existed. While it's a very obvious sign that feminism is an ideology that will use violence, it's too dated to have relevance to the modern movement of mentally defective sadists.
I don't want them to use violence, because people will be hurt, but nothing would advance the anti-feminist cause more than seeing the evil freaks attacking innocent people.
You do not become that by simply calling yourself a feminist. You can be deceived about what 'feminism' is, as I was when I called myself that.
The Nazis didn't really have much to do with right-wingers, then or now.
The problem is that 'ideologies' do not use violence, but people.
Maybe, maybe not. I expected a counter-revolution of sanity after the BLM reign of terror, but none was forthcoming.
I realize that you're trying to defend yourself here, but you weren't misled. Information about feminism is freely available, you just accepted the lies of your captors and went full Stockholm Syndrome.
Yes, people use violence, but some ideologies are more likely to support it than others. Tankies, feminists and Nazi LARPers are the most likely to justify it.
Because the rioting and looting was judged to be by criminals taking advantage of the protests by most normies. The good thing is that the feminists running that racket couldn't keep their hands out of the cookie jar and killed it off anyway.
Feminists can't play that game because they've openly called for violence. Their history is full of violence, and a lot of their side are waiting for the excuse to use it.