It's not exactly a secret that the "war on women" era of conservatism has included pandering to radfems and proposing an alliance with them.
More diversion to avoid how you specified 'quoting' a group as proof of infiltration...
I stand by my claim that they are willing to look the other way and take in "allies" that openly support it.
Huh. You're backtracking at a speed comparable to your Kim Potter predictions. Because your earlier claim was as follows: "Might as well rename it TheGearhart and be done with the subtle hints they support male depopulation."
Now you are claiming that they 'take in allies who openly support it'. OK, specifically name those allies and provide the proof that they openly support it.
No, I mean nearly everyone who commented on the astroturfed bullshit issue.
Free speech is an 'astroturfed bullshit issue'. You really are brain-dead.
I see no value in fighting for other people's issues when they won't fight for mine.
I'm not fighting for anyone's issue, just defeating a common enemy.
You knew what I meant. Quoting them in a way that endorses what they say.
I'm not backtracking, I was being hyperbolic earlier. I stand by what I thought, that they will allow TERFs in and allow them to set the direction of social policy.
Feminists advocate for bans of "misogynistic speech". Therefore, as a target of their bans, I fully support anything that gets them locked up in an uncomfortable cell to think about what hypocrites they are. Of course, feminists never change, so self-reflection is never going to happen.
It's not a common enemy. Beyond defeating transgender ideology pushed on children, which is already possible without women's support, what is there? I don't care about women's sports. They shouldn't even exist.
You knew what I meant. Quoting them in a way that endorses what they say.
OK, more backtracking. But even this does not make sense. Quoting someone to endorse a specific thing he says means that you have been 'infiltrated'? What idiocy.
I was being hyperbolic earlier
You, hyperbolic? No way! How could that happen?
Feminists advocate for bans of "misogynistic speech".
Alright, do you have any proof that this specific woman advocates for any such thing?
Therefore, as a target of their bans, I fully support anything that gets them locked up in an uncomfortable cell to think about what hypocrites they are.
I do believe this is called 'cutting off your nose to spite your face'. Either that, or you really are a shill for troons (which would explain a lot).
Beyond defeating transgender ideology pushed on children, which is already possible without women's support
Imagine thinking anything is possible with zero support from 51% of the population. No, there is a great chance of losing even with the support of many conservative Oppressor Gender members, and even GC.
I don't care about women's sports.
See, this is why you're a loser, and you always will be a loser. You think this is about your pea-sized brain 'caring' about something, when it is a potent political weapon against the enemy.
I've said this for years, all of use men must say we are black, hispanic, trans women, that are gay women, All the wage differences for all these groups will go up and they couldn't do shit about it. we wouldn't change who or what we are except for saying what we are and they go to jail, HILARIOUS
What the fuck is up with that place? Is that a bot? I regret clicking the link.
No diversions. Quoting someone is being infiltrated.
You stand by your claim that TD is dropping hints that it supports 'male genocide'.
I mean, no one here took you seriously, but how can you take yourself seriously after that?
Is this your usual definition of 'everyone', meaning "me and no one else"?
I don't need gratitude. If your strategy relies on people being grateful, you're an utter fool.
It's not exactly a secret that the "war on women" era of conservatism has included pandering to radfems and proposing an alliance with them.
I stand by my claim that they are willing to look the other way and take in "allies" that openly support it.
No, I mean nearly everyone who commented on the astroturfed bullshit issue.
I see no value in fighting for other people's issues when they won't fight for mine.
More diversion to avoid how you specified 'quoting' a group as proof of infiltration...
Huh. You're backtracking at a speed comparable to your Kim Potter predictions. Because your earlier claim was as follows: "Might as well rename it TheGearhart and be done with the subtle hints they support male depopulation."
Now you are claiming that they 'take in allies who openly support it'. OK, specifically name those allies and provide the proof that they openly support it.
Free speech is an 'astroturfed bullshit issue'. You really are brain-dead.
I'm not fighting for anyone's issue, just defeating a common enemy.
You knew what I meant. Quoting them in a way that endorses what they say.
I'm not backtracking, I was being hyperbolic earlier. I stand by what I thought, that they will allow TERFs in and allow them to set the direction of social policy.
Feminists advocate for bans of "misogynistic speech". Therefore, as a target of their bans, I fully support anything that gets them locked up in an uncomfortable cell to think about what hypocrites they are. Of course, feminists never change, so self-reflection is never going to happen.
It's not a common enemy. Beyond defeating transgender ideology pushed on children, which is already possible without women's support, what is there? I don't care about women's sports. They shouldn't even exist.
OK, more backtracking. But even this does not make sense. Quoting someone to endorse a specific thing he says means that you have been 'infiltrated'? What idiocy.
You, hyperbolic? No way! How could that happen?
Alright, do you have any proof that this specific woman advocates for any such thing?
I do believe this is called 'cutting off your nose to spite your face'. Either that, or you really are a shill for troons (which would explain a lot).
Imagine thinking anything is possible with zero support from 51% of the population. No, there is a great chance of losing even with the support of many conservative Oppressor Gender members, and even GC.
See, this is why you're a loser, and you always will be a loser. You think this is about your pea-sized brain 'caring' about something, when it is a potent political weapon against the enemy.
mikethemarine 1 points 17 minutes ago
What the fuck is up with that place? Is that a bot? I regret clicking the link.