Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?
I know I'm throwing my time at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.
You have to realize that the white nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our own diseased organs.
I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.
There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not socrates and I am not actually open to a debate. I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.
So a gay atheist?
Based
Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?
I know I'm throwing my time at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.
You have to realize that the white nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our own diseased organs.
I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.
There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not socrates and I am not actually open to a debate. I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.
Oh look I made the meaning of the words in the phrase actually make sense, how weird, isn't that just quacky, Imp?
Are you a troon to use language like "THEM! Murdering US!".
That's awfully troonish.
But you're not telling the truth, you're being a BPD/NPD Troon type with hyperbole like "they're murdering us".
First, who's they/them ? And can you cite a single dead body related to this "they/them" ?
No you can't, you're just a clown. You talk like the average Twitter Troon. I bet you're a troon IRL.