It just implies a nation for whites. A nation is not a government. The U.S. founding fathers were white nationalists(as were all whites during that time period) and they wanted the smallest possible state.
The Founding Fathers were not white nationalists, no matter how many times you say it. They were Liberal Revolutionaries. That is an ideological affiliation. They certainly didn't believe in any kind of Pan-European racial solidarity, as they are Europeans who have never at any point in history wanted that. The concept of a white racial unity is a creation of the progressive era.
They were anglo-saxons who wanted a nation for anglo-saxons. Had you suggested to them that their nation would end up as anything other than that they would laugh at you.
That's never been true. No white nationalist movement under any circumstance is prepared to accept a Libertarian approach to domestic law. White nationalists mock the idea of limited government since that very concept doesn't explicitly protect white people, and actively refuses to do so.
A White Nationalist state, like all other ethno-nationalist state attempts, will always explicitly discriminate against all other ethnicities within their own borders, and produce laws which explicitly favor that specific nationalist intellectual class. They require significant government intervention at every level of the economy to maintain those preferences, and they require a significant effort of categorizing, identifying, and racializing people into the legal categories of discrimination that they will invent, effecting literally all walks of life.
This happens literally 100% of the time, because it has to, otherwise it isn't an ethno-nationalist government. If the government doesn't intervene at every level of society, someone will complain that they are not protecting, uplifting, or supporting the identified group.
Yet, I know plenty of MGTOW who detest muslims. Something something Twin Towers.
I didn't know Stormfags wanted big central planning of the economy.
Literally all of them.
It just implies a nation for whites. A nation is not a government. The U.S. founding fathers were white nationalists(as were all whites during that time period) and they wanted the smallest possible state.
The Founding Fathers were not white nationalists, no matter how many times you say it. They were Liberal Revolutionaries. That is an ideological affiliation. They certainly didn't believe in any kind of Pan-European racial solidarity, as they are Europeans who have never at any point in history wanted that. The concept of a white racial unity is a creation of the progressive era.
They were anglo-saxons who wanted a nation for anglo-saxons. Had you suggested to them that their nation would end up as anything other than that they would laugh at you.
Not really. It implies strong border control, but border control is one of the most basic duties of government.
That's never been true. No white nationalist movement under any circumstance is prepared to accept a Libertarian approach to domestic law. White nationalists mock the idea of limited government since that very concept doesn't explicitly protect white people, and actively refuses to do so.
A White Nationalist state, like all other ethno-nationalist state attempts, will always explicitly discriminate against all other ethnicities within their own borders, and produce laws which explicitly favor that specific nationalist intellectual class. They require significant government intervention at every level of the economy to maintain those preferences, and they require a significant effort of categorizing, identifying, and racializing people into the legal categories of discrimination that they will invent, effecting literally all walks of life.
This happens literally 100% of the time, because it has to, otherwise it isn't an ethno-nationalist government. If the government doesn't intervene at every level of society, someone will complain that they are not protecting, uplifting, or supporting the identified group.
Not really. Just requires strict immigration.