Ahh, the collectivism argument. Where every single girl on the planet is Amber Heard because reasons, and every man on the planet is Johnny Depp because reasons. The only way this framing works is in the heads of the nutbars that invent reasons to dislike someone, based on group association. So, let's do that line of thinking shall we? Candace McDuffie works/worked at rolling stone, mtv news, paste magazine, glamour mag, essence, spin mag and the root. They're all tainted because of her. Gee, that was easy! No wonder they do it. You can blanket statement a group for any reason, because of things the rest of the collective group may never have done, or even considered doing Just that one of them in fact, did do the thing. So it's true about all of them for some reason. I still don't get it, but hey, that's the premise.
"If the mistreatment ... is ridiculed by the world..." doesn't square properly. You either mean "celebrated" or you meant to only use one of 'mistreatment' or 'ridicule.' But lazy misconstruction of your argument aside, I must assert for clarity that what people are actually doing is ridiculing the mistreatment conducted of Amber Heard BEFORE this point. The present treatment is being celebrated, and it is being celebrated for its karmic comeuppance relative to the previous undeserved favor and lavish support.
So then, how does the celebration of present justice, and ridicule of past injustice (mistreatment) result in a dangerous outcome for Black women? Do tell.
Ahh, the collectivism argument. Where every single girl on the planet is Amber Heard because reasons, and every man on the planet is Johnny Depp because reasons. The only way this framing works is in the heads of the nutbars that invent reasons to dislike someone, based on group association. So, let's do that line of thinking shall we? Candace McDuffie works/worked at rolling stone, mtv news, paste magazine, glamour mag, essence, spin mag and the root. They're all tainted because of her. Gee, that was easy! No wonder they do it. You can blanket statement a group for any reason, because of things the rest of the collective group may never have done, or even considered doing Just that one of them in fact, did do the thing. So it's true about all of them for some reason. I still don't get it, but hey, that's the premise.
I think Rolling Stone still won't admit they platformed a liar in covering "mattress girl" who invented the Duke lacrosse rape hoax.
Can't imagine any of the other publications are any better, especially the Root lmao.
What does it mean? It means you just might be held accountable for your actions.
That is their greatest fear.
"If the mistreatment ... is ridiculed by the world..." doesn't square properly. You either mean "celebrated" or you meant to only use one of 'mistreatment' or 'ridicule.' But lazy misconstruction of your argument aside, I must assert for clarity that what people are actually doing is ridiculing the mistreatment conducted of Amber Heard BEFORE this point. The present treatment is being celebrated, and it is being celebrated for its karmic comeuppance relative to the previous undeserved favor and lavish support.
So then, how does the celebration of present justice, and ridicule of past injustice (mistreatment) result in a dangerous outcome for Black women? Do tell.
That means the mistreatment itself was ridiculed, not the person who was mistreated. Writer doesn't know how to write.
Shut up Shaniqua McMuffin