We owe you nothing. If you want protection, pay for bodyguards.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
I can ask you the same question. That top post is sociopathic (that's basically the female Impy, though probably somewhat more neurotic than you), but it does not call for violence.
You confused it with another screenshot that had 0 upvotes, dummy.
It's a shame r/MenKampf got banned. This is near verbatim from Adolf Hitler about Jewish influence.
It's very thinly veiled. The last part about refusing to date was added purely to obscure what is being said.
She literally said she wants to shoot up a gathering of men, her intent with this post is obvious.
Yes, it is. It sounds like one of your rants against women, but with more PMS. But you claimed it was a call to violence, which it was not.
It clearly is, based off the phrasing used and the known feelings of the OP.
No, nothing in the phrasing calls for violence (any more than your sociopathic rants against women do), and the 'known feelings' are irrelevant as to whether these specific words call for violence.
Your claim was not about 'intent' though. Your claim was that a 'top post' called for violence, which it did not. Like I said, you confused these two posts, and now you're too much of a pussy to admit that you did.
It is a call for violence. It's just as bad as the shooter manifestos we are told about. If that's not a call for violence, incels need to be taken off the terrorist watch list. The fact she added a fig leaf to hide her true intent should be obvious.
The fact that women are physically weak and prefer harming people on a societal level so they don't get their asses kicked is irrelevant.
It sounds like your own comments.
Wait, so it's not a call for violence, which is not "harming people on a societal level". Like the feminist and woman that you are, you like to call everything that you dislike 'violence'.