We owe you nothing. If you want protection, pay for bodyguards.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Your claim was not about 'intent' though. Your claim was that a 'top post' called for violence, which it did not. Like I said, you confused these two posts, and now you're too much of a pussy to admit that you did.
It is a call for violence. It's just as bad as the shooter manifestos we are told about. If that's not a call for violence, incels need to be taken off the terrorist watch list. The fact she added a fig leaf to hide her true intent should be obvious.
The fact that women are physically weak and prefer harming people on a societal level so they don't get their asses kicked is irrelevant.
It sounds like your own comments.
Wait, so it's not a call for violence, which is not "harming people on a societal level". Like the feminist and woman that you are, you like to call everything that you dislike 'violence'.
Let's test that. I'll make a post here sounding exactly like that one and let's see if it gets reported.
It is a call for violence. It doesn't mean anyone will be stupid enough to follow through with it.
It would, but not for inciting violence, which it is not. And if someone did say that about women, you would agree with it 100% - it's basically your entire posting history.
Instead of being batshit crazy and claiming violence where there is none, how about you point out that Reddit is not enforcing its supposed rules against 'hateful speech'?