Don't remind me. They fell for the most obvious reverse psychology you'll ever see.
"Democrats support this, so it must be bad" - Josh Hawley's pea brain.
I really wonder how long they had been planning Ukraine for - a lawyer was taken out by a pretty obvious glowfuck for advocating the DoD's recommendation that women should be drafted should make it unconstitutional for only men to be drafted, as the military efficacy argument doesn't work.
They really wanted this settled in Congress, so they could say "the people decided it's time for you to die."
The were planning the Ukraine war before Trump was elected. Think back to when it started, 2014. It was just part of implementing Agenda 21 in Europe. Trump just delayed it for two or three years. Now they are back on track and implementing Agenda 2030.
Because it's pretty obvious the Democrats don't actually support drafting women. The reason they pulled the vote, the reason they made it close, was because they knew even if a Republican supported it, it was political suicide to side with the Democrats and be that deciding vote.
Senator Rick Scott (R-FL)
I remember this guy used to receive donations from the NOW.
I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. Primary, please. I beg.
As for fucking Hawley...I saw an ad/tweet/article where he talked about how society is against men.
Yulia and Kateryna met with Pope Francis earlier this week, hoping he might intervene Credit: AFP
What. how could she escape to vatican city but do nothing in her country?
Of course nobody knows better than Russians, upon whose psyche the Nazi blockade of Leningrad remains etched, the awful realities of siege warfare. Now they are inflicting the same pitiless constriction once visited upon them on their desperate enemies.
Comparing russhians to nahzis, check
next sentence calling azov nationalists: check
The Azov are a hardcore band of ultra-nationalist militia fighters
far-Right extremism has been purged from the ranks
have these cucks interviewed any of the 'almost nazi' rushians? Hmm??
Yet in describing their men, these women find themselves letting slip not common values but how different they are to their country folk.
also, the country 'folk' arent killing their own people. oopsies
we have been fighting that war since 2014.” That’s why they, like Putin, don’t talk about February’s invasion as a war. They merely regard it as “an escalation”.
where they ALMOST admit the civ shelling. niggard faux journalists dont FAK CHEK THIS, FUNNY ENOUGH
And if they criticise some Ukrainians for complacency, they blame others for outright treachery.
sounds like the biden admiistration, as a country.
The Azov were ready to be surrounded but hoped Ukrainian armed forces in cities close to Mariupol would stand firm. That didn’t happen,” says Yuliia. “They let the Russian army grab the cities around Mariupol.” She even suggests Volodymyr Baranyuk, commander of Ukraine’s 36th Marine Brigade in Mariupol, “had close contacts with Russians”. Baranyuk was initially reported to have led a daring attempt to break the siege in April, but says Yuliia, the reality was “he turned out to be a traitor and went into Russian captivity even when marines still had weapons to fight.”
yeah there was heavy fighting in mariupol for most of the war, obv because they gave up early, lmao. or these are the faggots who were sitting in the factory the whole time? if they say "let russians grab' they have no understanding of the size of the army bearing down on the country. ukr also has no air force. and these niggas thought they would stop that huge army? maybe thats why theyre sitting in a factory, because they were ready to fight the russhians. AND, they were given opportunities to surrender, and chose NOT TO... so these wives are complaining about a situation that their men are prolonging.
he didnt seem to be a traitor of that level, (working with the ru) but he did leave his post and fuckover the defense of parts of the city. what is these brave azov excuse for not fighting and refusing to surrender?
Nothing could be less honourable for the desperados of the Azov regiment. “They will fight, fight to the end and they will die there,” says Yuliia. There is no prospect of mercy, she says: “Every Azov soldier who surrendered during the last eight years was tortured and killed.” A month ago, she says, one soldier was taken prisoner. “The Russians made propaganda videos with him and then they tortured him and killed him and took a photo of his dead body and sent to his mother. That’s why the whole world must understand that captivity is not an option for the Azov regiment.”
thats not even true. the first part where 'every azov was killed'. there is proof of many azov being taken as pows. and hte killing him and sending pics to the mother--- is what UKR was doing to russians... its hard knowing how much a woife would know that is true in a war in that country.
And this is also ukronaz propoganda.
“We will have our whole country, independent, even Crimea, even the Donbas,” says Yuliia. “It can be done in one year or 10 years but we are ready to fight for our whole lives.”
SO they literally want to keep killing civs in the donbas regions. unclear if they know that side of the fight - or what theyre told by the ukr endorsed nazi legions, but it is plausible that they do not care of their husbands murdering civilians.
“Each time the wife of an [Azov] fighter says goodbye to him, it is the last goodbye,” says Yuliia. “Because we are always ready to learn that they are dead.”
That's sad, but unfortunate expectations meet you upon war. It almost sounds like she supports one of the reasons that started it (the killing of civilians by her husbands military). ITs gay journos, but they should have asked her opinion of those murdered civilians. Id venture she might say it was poopin's fault.
They were literally never "murdering civilians". Nor even just "killing civs" in colleteral damage of any sort, as they liberated Mariupol in 1 day in a raid with zero artillery (the heaviest weapon they used was a 23 mm autocannon on a dump truck, which they used to destroy the BRDM armored car at the separatist HQ), and later fought (for years) in the area where they evacuated all civs before the fighting began. You just don't know anything about it. I guess you know now.
They still have. Drones and fighters and helicopters and transport planes, everything is being used daily.
The Americans have destroyed all their bombers by 2001, along with all their strategic missiles. That's what they don't have now.
where they ALMOST admit the civ shelling.
Azov mortars were only in use in the area 100% clear of civs. Namely in and around Shirokino (aka Shyrokyne).
And they only had infantry mortars as arty. The BTR-4s with 30 mm guns as combat vehicles (wheeled APCs) received later to replace their improvised machine gun trucks. It was a popular militia and then a patrol police unit and then a national guard special forces unit, always super light.
But if you do know about any incident involving Azov members and "the civ shelling" 2014-2022, you may inform me. I'm all ears.
Hallo, Frau. Wie geht es dir heute? Geht es Dir gut? Ich höre, Ihr Mann ist auf der Vorderseite und kämpft gegen die böse Geißel, die das große Vaterland bedroht. Möchten Sie ein wenig über sich selbst erzählen und wie sich dies am meisten auf Sie auswirkt?
Hello, woman. How are you today? Are you okay? I hear your husband is on the front and fighting against the evil scourge that threatens the great fatherland. Would you like to tell a little about yourself and how this affects you the most?
Its a regiment not a battalion, and ideologically it's not the early 2014 too.
Azov regiment men
Tell you in literally first paragraph. It was a battalion for like 4 months, regiment for since September of 2014.
They also have servicewomen btw.
The Azov are a hardcore band of ultra-nationalist militia fighters
No, they're national guard regulars.
(There are Azov movement militias elsewhere, they call themselves Freikorps but phonetically and in Cyryllic, and actually always just "Freikor" about which I don't know why: 1234 These guys are closely associated with the "Social-National" party like the original Azov unit, under the original leadership. There's more than 20,000 Azov Civil Corps members and a few thousand militia, one battalion of which is in Kharkiv.)
And there are also marines (from another brigade, not the mentioned one), territorial defense members, border guards and others there.
The reason why the feminist media calls it the Azov Regiment is because Azov Battalion is still listed as a Neo-Nazi hate group. They're playing their typical naming games, but in reverse.
People call it a regiment because it is a regiment. Since September 17, 2014.
English language Wikipedos and most Western journos and American politicians and others have insisted on calling them a battalion (and a "militia" which they also aren't), but even the Russian Wikipedia article title is "Azov (polk)" that is Azov (regiment): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Азов_(полк)
All these feminist countries working together to cause nuclear war makes me physically ill.
Don't remind me. They fell for the most obvious reverse psychology you'll ever see.
"Democrats support this, so it must be bad" - Josh Hawley's pea brain.
I really wonder how long they had been planning Ukraine for - a lawyer was taken out by a pretty obvious glowfuck for advocating the DoD's recommendation that women should be drafted should make it unconstitutional for only men to be drafted, as the military efficacy argument doesn't work.
They really wanted this settled in Congress, so they could say "the people decided it's time for you to die."
The were planning the Ukraine war before Trump was elected. Think back to when it started, 2014. It was just part of implementing Agenda 21 in Europe. Trump just delayed it for two or three years. Now they are back on track and implementing Agenda 2030.
Because it's pretty obvious the Democrats don't actually support drafting women. The reason they pulled the vote, the reason they made it close, was because they knew even if a Republican supported it, it was political suicide to side with the Democrats and be that deciding vote.
I remember this guy used to receive donations from the NOW.
I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. Primary, please. I beg.
As for fucking Hawley...I saw an ad/tweet/article where he talked about how society is against men.
No fucking shit, you're part of it.
The thing is, we'll never know if it was all just theater. Would the Democrats have fought harder if the Republicans didn't cuck out?
It's hilarious that it's those three. I remember them doing the anti-feminist pandering speeches last election cycle.
It seems clear that you can't have a full win. Everyone is flawed in some way, everyone wants to give them some kind of concession.
I also thought Hawley was suspicious. He didn't have a record for speaking up for men before it was election time.
What. how could she escape to vatican city but do nothing in her country?
Comparing russhians to nahzis, check
next sentence calling azov nationalists: check
have these cucks interviewed any of the 'almost nazi' rushians? Hmm??
Yet in describing their men, these women find themselves letting slip not common values but how different they are to their country folk.
also, the country 'folk' arent killing their own people. oopsies
where they ALMOST admit the civ shelling. niggard faux journalists dont FAK CHEK THIS, FUNNY ENOUGH
sounds like the biden admiistration, as a country.
yeah there was heavy fighting in mariupol for most of the war, obv because they gave up early, lmao. or these are the faggots who were sitting in the factory the whole time? if they say "let russians grab' they have no understanding of the size of the army bearing down on the country. ukr also has no air force. and these niggas thought they would stop that huge army? maybe thats why theyre sitting in a factory, because they were ready to fight the russhians. AND, they were given opportunities to surrender, and chose NOT TO... so these wives are complaining about a situation that their men are prolonging.
he didnt seem to be a traitor of that level, (working with the ru) but he did leave his post and fuckover the defense of parts of the city. what is these brave azov excuse for not fighting and refusing to surrender?
thats not even true. the first part where 'every azov was killed'. there is proof of many azov being taken as pows. and hte killing him and sending pics to the mother--- is what UKR was doing to russians... its hard knowing how much a woife would know that is true in a war in that country.
And this is also ukronaz propoganda.
SO they literally want to keep killing civs in the donbas regions. unclear if they know that side of the fight - or what theyre told by the ukr endorsed nazi legions, but it is plausible that they do not care of their husbands murdering civilians.
That's sad, but unfortunate expectations meet you upon war. It almost sounds like she supports one of the reasons that started it (the killing of civilians by her husbands military). ITs gay journos, but they should have asked her opinion of those murdered civilians. Id venture she might say it was poopin's fault.
So hey, are you going to inform me about all this "killing civs" by "shelling" you claimed they engaged so much, or not?
I'd like you to tell me this secret truth, don't be shy. Places and dates would be enough.
Actually just 1 (one) incident of this kind would be sufficient.
If not, also tell me, and explain why.
They were literally never "murdering civilians". Nor even just "killing civs" in colleteral damage of any sort, as they liberated Mariupol in 1 day in a raid with zero artillery (the heaviest weapon they used was a 23 mm autocannon on a dump truck, which they used to destroy the BRDM armored car at the separatist HQ), and later fought (for years) in the area where they evacuated all civs before the fighting began. You just don't know anything about it. I guess you know now.
Correction, it was even just a 14.5 mm gun: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/20140614_UkraineAlert_MariupolTank.jpg
Feel free to compare to Russian firepower used to destroy the city and kill or injure tens of thousands.
They still have. Drones and fighters and helicopters and transport planes, everything is being used daily.
The Americans have destroyed all their bombers by 2001, along with all their strategic missiles. That's what they don't have now.
Azov mortars were only in use in the area 100% clear of civs. Namely in and around Shirokino (aka Shyrokyne).
And they only had infantry mortars as arty. The BTR-4s with 30 mm guns as combat vehicles (wheeled APCs) received later to replace their improvised machine gun trucks. It was a popular militia and then a patrol police unit and then a national guard special forces unit, always super light.
But if you do know about any incident involving Azov members and "the civ shelling" 2014-2022, you may inform me. I'm all ears.
Hallo, Frau. Wie geht es dir heute? Geht es Dir gut? Ich höre, Ihr Mann ist auf der Vorderseite und kämpft gegen die böse Geißel, die das große Vaterland bedroht. Möchten Sie ein wenig über sich selbst erzählen und wie sich dies am meisten auf Sie auswirkt?
Its a regiment not a battalion, and ideologically it's not the early 2014 too.
Tell you in literally first paragraph. It was a battalion for like 4 months, regiment for since September of 2014.
They also have servicewomen btw.
No, they're national guard regulars.
(There are Azov movement militias elsewhere, they call themselves Freikorps but phonetically and in Cyryllic, and actually always just "Freikor" about which I don't know why: 1 2 3 4 These guys are closely associated with the "Social-National" party like the original Azov unit, under the original leadership. There's more than 20,000 Azov Civil Corps members and a few thousand militia, one battalion of which is in Kharkiv.)
And there are also marines (from another brigade, not the mentioned one), territorial defense members, border guards and others there.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/15HIJwbBWi/adl-before-and-after-they-get-a-/c
The reason why the feminist media calls it the Azov Regiment is because Azov Battalion is still listed as a Neo-Nazi hate group. They're playing their typical naming games, but in reverse.
https://archive.ph/MwHwx
People call it a regiment because it is a regiment. Since September 17, 2014.
English language Wikipedos and most Western journos and American politicians and others have insisted on calling them a battalion (and a "militia" which they also aren't), but even the Russian Wikipedia article title is "Azov (polk)" that is Azov (regiment): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Азов_(полк)