I picked a fight with them way after they started spamming here.
It's ramping up because of ConPro. They dominate the front page when TD is hidden. They have enough users to effectively evangelize, going from community to community, spamming about Jews and their failed tradcuck system.
I still find it hilarious that they banned me. Talk about ideology that can't handle or counter criticism. That's why all the downvotes and fake reports too.
Same book as GC played from at TumblrInAction. Exactly the same.
I never noticed any "spamming". I'm still unsure of who or what you're referring to. Them being allowed to post on whatever board as long as they keep it civil enough to not get banned isn't spamming.
When I said ramping up, I meant all platforms, not just .win boards. I guess I should have been more clear.
But at the same time, it sounds like you're just mad that free speech is actually happening. You can call Christianity a "failed tradcuck system" and say they're in cahoots with the feminists to reduce the male population and enslave them, but they shouldn't be allowed to say what they want about Jews? How's that make any sense?
That's why all the downvotes and fake reports too.
Bro are you actually saying ConPro users shadow you and downvote all your shit? Come on now. I haven't seen you mentioned there in months, they aren't thinking about you.
His comments, regardless of how benign, routinely get dogpile downvotes in threads where nobody breaks 6 or 7 votes. So does Jester, but his posts are basically 90% insults, name calling, and instigation.
Not that internet points matter for anything beyond positioning of your comments on a page, and claiming definitively that it's ConPro when really there's no way to tell, but you can't deny people are definitely negatively interacting on name alone.
His comments, regardless of how benign, routinely get dogpile downvotes in threads where nobody breaks 6 or 7 votes.
How often does this happen? I notice him getting downvoted, but it's usually when he says especially retarded shit. His more lucid comments get plenty of upvotes.
I picked a fight with them way after they started spamming here.
It's ramping up because of ConPro. They dominate the front page when TD is hidden. They have enough users to effectively evangelize, going from community to community, spamming about Jews and their failed tradcuck system.
I still find it hilarious that they banned me. Talk about ideology that can't handle or counter criticism. That's why all the downvotes and fake reports too.
Same book as GC played from at TumblrInAction. Exactly the same.
I never noticed any "spamming". I'm still unsure of who or what you're referring to. Them being allowed to post on whatever board as long as they keep it civil enough to not get banned isn't spamming.
When I said ramping up, I meant all platforms, not just .win boards. I guess I should have been more clear.
But at the same time, it sounds like you're just mad that free speech is actually happening. You can call Christianity a "failed tradcuck system" and say they're in cahoots with the feminists to reduce the male population and enslave them, but they shouldn't be allowed to say what they want about Jews? How's that make any sense?
Bro are you actually saying ConPro users shadow you and downvote all your shit? Come on now. I haven't seen you mentioned there in months, they aren't thinking about you.
His comments, regardless of how benign, routinely get dogpile downvotes in threads where nobody breaks 6 or 7 votes. So does Jester, but his posts are basically 90% insults, name calling, and instigation.
Not that internet points matter for anything beyond positioning of your comments on a page, and claiming definitively that it's ConPro when really there's no way to tell, but you can't deny people are definitely negatively interacting on name alone.
How often does this happen? I notice him getting downvoted, but it's usually when he says especially retarded shit. His more lucid comments get plenty of upvotes.
Comment Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
Comment Approved: I don't see how.