The reason this comes up is because I was reading Imp1 comments and replies to them and he’s mentioned multiple times before that he believes that the actual answer to a lot of this is making artificial wombs so that you can cut out women from making kids and relationships with women have to be about something else. That would mean that since women can't use their wombs as a bargaining tool, their intellect and personalities have to be what keeps a man interested, at least imo, and I can see why it would appeal to him, but are they even reasonable?
I haven't done the research myself and thought it would be more fun to have a discussion over it, but still, I’m just curious as to how the tech works if at all. I've seen things where the tech is being “suppressed” (hidden from the public like a lot of current tech we use today was during the Cold War, ala the internet), but is that true, or not? It's just genuinely an interesting topic to me.
Why you stalking me? :O
Artificial wombs are just part of the answer - it's that slight push off the fence for all the birth rate shilling tradcucks who will keep pumping out kids to live miserable lives under the feminist system or else "muh blacks" will take over.
The tradcuck answer to low birth rates is effectively to try and re-link sex with pregnancy by banning abortion, and I bet they'd have porn banned if they could, just to really manipulate those base instincts. Why fix the system when you can just manipulate naive young adults who barely grew up into misery all their lives?
I'm not pro-choice, obviously. Supporting women in anything is against all of what I stand for. But I can't help but think this is the solution of the tradcon right for the crashing birth rates.
The true answer to ending our feminist hell is a difficult one, with a lot of permutations based on things we don't yet know, as well as how severely we punish those involved in it. There's way too much complexity in the issues, so many motives that can be implied but never confirmed.
A personal favorite theory of mine that can probably never be proven - feminist teachers psychologically abuse boys to make them the perfect slaves/subordinates to women as adults, which is why fake relationships like OnlyFans exist.
Ah yes, procreation is the manipulation of natural instincts, not pornography.
It's interesting that you think this argument makes sense.
The definition of manipulation literally includes making people make stupid decisions for your benefit. Procreation in the current legal climate is the very definition of that.
It does make sense. The porn industry doesn't rake in billions annually by being scrupulous.
No, they rake in billions by being a way to suppress base desires without ruining your life.
I mentioned this before, artificial wombs sounds nice until they figure out how to make girls only. It will be the feminists that will use those artificial wombs, not men. After that it will be state sponsored artificial wombs, just basic healthcare for women, it will become the general rule and watch how many of them will be girls.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/140vevOwwo/the-more-feminine-way-has-found-/c
They're way ahead of us on that.
If they show such obvious malevolence, won't it be a win for us? Our only true win condition is for the mask to fall so obviously that even normies hate them. I don't see any other way to end this non-violently than women's social status collapsing harder than Terra.