Yes and no. Yes the Biden Regime is making agreements, no you can't actually give up sovereignty.
This is the same thing as when people were harping on giving sovereignty over to the UN.
No one, literally no one, can do that. The Constitution supersedes everything within the law.
The end-run around is congress promising to pass laws that reflect treaties. We can see how well that works with Climate Change agreements, and the fact that most of the time no one actually makes laws domestically to follow them.
With regards to the climate issue, they have been using executive orders and federal agency regulations to attack and weaken the fossil fuel industry in order to force their climate agenda on everyone.
I think it is possible that even though it is blatantly unconstitutional they will try to somehow enforce these authoritarian pandemic treaties domestically in the U.S.
Since you generally provide insightful comments, I am curious about what you think will actually come out of this.
Look, you said it yourself. They also just plainly disregard the law in multiple cases. They are already doing the bidding of the Cathedral... because they are the Cathedral. This really isn't going to change anything because no one has actually done anything different. The formal structures that are in place, are still in place. The informal workarounds are also still in place. The leadership hasn't changed.
Yes, American sovereignty is being eroded by a globalist elite, but that's been the case for nearly 100 years. The regime continues to serve the interests of the cathedral. It will continue to do so. I don't get why this is an issue.
The thing that still remains, again, is that the courts do not accept international treaties for domestic law... which means that the regime either makes a law or an executive order. As they already do.
It's just kind of a nothing-burger. We're not going to be ruled by Belgium like the Brits were, but we're still going to have to deal with the same people pulling the same shit.
And that is why the UK would have been more free as a US State, than a member of the European Union.
Hell, you actually get the freedom to police your own borders.
And your Royal Navy Carriers?
Article 1 of the Constitution. Also, the 2nd Amendment actually still applies to the "State Militias". Your entire nuclear force could just be reclassified as a British State Militia, and no changes have to be made.
The reporting that this "strips every nation of its own sovereignty" is wrong and click-baity for sure, but if the current administration willingly delegates their authority to China (let's be real that's all the WHO is) and none of the other sources of power within the country present any real pushback - the way the states have willingly given up their sovereignty to the feds - isn't it effectively the same thing? If it lasts long enough you'll even have idiot judges ruling that following the international treaties is precedent and "settled law".
International treaties can't be precedent. That's the point. They must be ratified by a domestic legislature.
I agree that the Regime is acquiescing to the Cathedral, but what the hell is the difference between being ruled by the Cathedral, and abiding by the Cathedral's policies? It doesn't really make any sense. One way or another, the Cathedral is still in power, and nothing has changed.
Yes and no. Yes the Biden Regime is making agreements, no you can't actually give up sovereignty.
This is the same thing as when people were harping on giving sovereignty over to the UN.
No one, literally no one, can do that. The Constitution supersedes everything within the law.
The end-run around is congress promising to pass laws that reflect treaties. We can see how well that works with Climate Change agreements, and the fact that most of the time no one actually makes laws domestically to follow them.
With regards to the climate issue, they have been using executive orders and federal agency regulations to attack and weaken the fossil fuel industry in order to force their climate agenda on everyone.
I think it is possible that even though it is blatantly unconstitutional they will try to somehow enforce these authoritarian pandemic treaties domestically in the U.S.
Since you generally provide insightful comments, I am curious about what you think will actually come out of this.
Nothing different from what already happens.
Look, you said it yourself. They also just plainly disregard the law in multiple cases. They are already doing the bidding of the Cathedral... because they are the Cathedral. This really isn't going to change anything because no one has actually done anything different. The formal structures that are in place, are still in place. The informal workarounds are also still in place. The leadership hasn't changed.
Yes, American sovereignty is being eroded by a globalist elite, but that's been the case for nearly 100 years. The regime continues to serve the interests of the cathedral. It will continue to do so. I don't get why this is an issue.
The thing that still remains, again, is that the courts do not accept international treaties for domestic law... which means that the regime either makes a law or an executive order. As they already do.
It's just kind of a nothing-burger. We're not going to be ruled by Belgium like the Brits were, but we're still going to have to deal with the same people pulling the same shit.
That is unfortunately not how it works in the EU.
And that is why the UK would have been more free as a US State, than a member of the European Union.
Hell, you actually get the freedom to police your own borders.
And your Royal Navy Carriers?
Article 1 of the Constitution. Also, the 2nd Amendment actually still applies to the "State Militias". Your entire nuclear force could just be reclassified as a British State Militia, and no changes have to be made.
The reporting that this "strips every nation of its own sovereignty" is wrong and click-baity for sure, but if the current administration willingly delegates their authority to China (let's be real that's all the WHO is) and none of the other sources of power within the country present any real pushback - the way the states have willingly given up their sovereignty to the feds - isn't it effectively the same thing? If it lasts long enough you'll even have idiot judges ruling that following the international treaties is precedent and "settled law".
International treaties can't be precedent. That's the point. They must be ratified by a domestic legislature.
I agree that the Regime is acquiescing to the Cathedral, but what the hell is the difference between being ruled by the Cathedral, and abiding by the Cathedral's policies? It doesn't really make any sense. One way or another, the Cathedral is still in power, and nothing has changed.