These laws are found in feminist countries in Europe - they have been used by women who were cheated on as an excuse to knife her husband to death while he slept.
Stephen Kamlish QC, defending, insisted the killing was unplanned.
He suggested that if the defendant had wanted to kill her diabetic husband, she could have given him a bigger dose of insulin and "no one would have known".
Why the fuck are lawyers so fucking slimy and treacherous...
I found an archive of the old r/MensRights post when "coercive control" was new. It explains the pattern and the games they're playing better than my ranting does.
These laws are found in feminist countries in Europe - they have been used by women who were cheated on as an excuse to knife her husband to death while he slept.
I've got a worse one, a woman used it after beating her disabled husband to death with his walking stick that he needed to stand up.
She got away with it. It was fucking unbelievable. Tell me how a man who can barely stand on his own can be abusive.
https://archive.ph/RnliC
Why the fuck are lawyers so fucking slimy and treacherous...
I found an archive of the old r/MensRights post when "coercive control" was new. It explains the pattern and the games they're playing better than my ranting does.
https://archive.ph/ENpdu
It's their job. He would be a bad lawyer had he not used every tool at his disposal to defend his client.
Would love to see a proposal that allows it in reverse. Heh.