Yep, you have it correct. If some troon wants to make a Sim that's their ideal self as the opposite sex they're totally free to do so. Hell, if they wanted to (I'm speaking for 3 here because I've never played 4) they can make a Sim just like them as their real sex then change change the sex to the opposite sex version of that Sim.
Why would anyone be trans in what is effectively an entirely utopian idea?
Because there's no way to be special and get free attention and goodies if they're actually the opposite sex. They also can't push groom children into mutilating themselves and advocate degenerate sexual behavior.
Very true. It's also true that MtF troons are getting the better of real women in the Oppression Olympics and that obviously has its upsides. I guess what I'm trying to say is that if we gained the ability to make men into real women (XX chromosomes, female reproductive parts, the whole 9 yards) they would probably be against it because there's value in being a troon. They're out to push degeneracy. Pushing sex with real women is "problematic". Pushing sex with a man in a dress who has a degenerate fetish is a progressive way to fight the "patriarchy".
Yep, you have it correct. If some troon wants to make a Sim that's their ideal self as the opposite sex they're totally free to do so. Hell, if they wanted to (I'm speaking for 3 here because I've never played 4) they can make a Sim just like them as their real sex then change change the sex to the opposite sex version of that Sim.
Because there's no way to be special and get free attention and goodies if they're actually the opposite sex. They also can't push groom children into mutilating themselves and advocate degenerate sexual behavior.
Literally Hitler probably could.
He put off marrying his mistress so as not piss off his female fans.
No wonder the allies feared him, no man should have such power. Imagine if he had two testicles.
Very true. It's also true that MtF troons are getting the better of real women in the Oppression Olympics and that obviously has its upsides. I guess what I'm trying to say is that if we gained the ability to make men into real women (XX chromosomes, female reproductive parts, the whole 9 yards) they would probably be against it because there's value in being a troon. They're out to push degeneracy. Pushing sex with real women is "problematic". Pushing sex with a man in a dress who has a degenerate fetish is a progressive way to fight the "patriarchy".
Easy; musicians/singers, actors, and "entertainers".
You'll notice these are all people who sell themselves for money already so it's not that much of a jump to something like selling Bath water.
Any guy from a popular K-Pop group in the East.
Any guy from a popular boy band in the West.
Robbie Williams, a former boy band member.
Ronan Keeting, also a former buy band member, despite the fact he cheated on his wife or possibly because of it as it means the others have a chance.
Jason Mamoa.
Robert Pattinson during his Twilight days.
Oded Fehr.
Brad Pitt at the turn of the millennium.
Leonardo DiCaprio also at the turn of the millennium, when he was in Romeo and Juliet.
It's not going to be a short list but it's also not going to be a list of poor men who need the money in the first place either.