I'm sure this will end well
(archive.ph)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
No, that's why scripture is retarded.
You can have religion without a book.
I should start one and then claim religious exemption to paying taxes that go towards women's expenses.
It'll worship Adam and portray Eve as the devil's minion who sold out humanity.
Convert to Quakerism.
I still think Fox's ideas are the only branch of Christianity that can coexist with rationalism over the long term.
That is how the world works isn't it.
But in all seriousness, we ditched scripture, iconography, and clergy because forms are restrictive. Every being has a connection to god, we perceive it when we experience pain from knowledge. It's what differentiates us from organisms. We WERE and remain organisms, but something else besides which they are not. In that way, we are both flawed and deviant from god's design (relative to other organisms), but simultaneously more alike to and connected to god.
While it might be blithe to shrug off original sin as a happy little accident, that's kinda what it was.
The whole idea is purely to try and leverage religion to get out of having to support women's existence. It doesn't really matter whether it makes sense or not, it's just a facetious swipe at the fact that religion worships women anyway.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This sounds like a criticism of religion generally.