None of these leftoid anti-White race traitors seem to be able to reconcile that in 100BC, the indigenous populations of the Americas were uncontacted. Sub-Saharan Africans were mostly uncontacted and any slavery at the time was Africans enslaving Africans and the slave trade was entirely limited to the Middle East.
And while the Greeks were building the Colossus of Rhodes, what were Africans doing? What were Indians doing? Nothing. They were an evolutionary dead end. This is over a thousand years before any of these claims of "stolen resources" and "genocide" and "slavery" could ever be used. Whites needed to invent transoceanic galleons before it was ever possible to do those things, meaning they already had infinitely surpassed the capabilities of any of these trash peoples. Then we're told that those galleons were the product of "stolen land" from a bunch of mindless savages who never once created a government.
No wonder the 1619 project is so sacred to them. It is literally central to their beliefs that world history only existed after the point where they could make these claims of persecution.
Romans built towering marble temples to Jupiter ar the same time that Africans were failing to even invent literacy.
We are not the same. It's not genocide when one species out-competes an inferior one. It's evolution.
And if we ever did carry out genocide, then why are there still mouthy ingrates alive to complain about it?
You can't steal "resources" from someone that gives no value to it. Even if they did somehow figure out it could be useful, it's not like they would do anything with it.
Yeah this is like the 'stolen wealth' shit. Gold meant nothing to the animal tribes of Central America. It has no actual intrinsic value, it only has value in an economy that can ascribe and translate worth, and then turn that worth into some kind of labor.
Hold on, The Inca and Maya and Aztecs all loved gold. They had very good metallurgry, but very little accessible iron. They (The Inca, at the very least) made do with very good alloys of silver, copper, tin, gold etc. Their bronzes were phenomenal for the time. What is strange to me is that they did very little oceanic exploration, considering the abundance of suitable timber.
Jesus Christ those comments.
None of these leftoid anti-White race traitors seem to be able to reconcile that in 100BC, the indigenous populations of the Americas were uncontacted. Sub-Saharan Africans were mostly uncontacted and any slavery at the time was Africans enslaving Africans and the slave trade was entirely limited to the Middle East.
And while the Greeks were building the Colossus of Rhodes, what were Africans doing? What were Indians doing? Nothing. They were an evolutionary dead end. This is over a thousand years before any of these claims of "stolen resources" and "genocide" and "slavery" could ever be used. Whites needed to invent transoceanic galleons before it was ever possible to do those things, meaning they already had infinitely surpassed the capabilities of any of these trash peoples. Then we're told that those galleons were the product of "stolen land" from a bunch of mindless savages who never once created a government.
No wonder the 1619 project is so sacred to them. It is literally central to their beliefs that world history only existed after the point where they could make these claims of persecution.
Romans built towering marble temples to Jupiter ar the same time that Africans were failing to even invent literacy.
We are not the same. It's not genocide when one species out-competes an inferior one. It's evolution.
And if we ever did carry out genocide, then why are there still mouthy ingrates alive to complain about it?
WE WUZ GALLEON BUILDERS N SHEEEIT.
You can't steal "resources" from someone that gives no value to it. Even if they did somehow figure out it could be useful, it's not like they would do anything with it.
Yeah this is like the 'stolen wealth' shit. Gold meant nothing to the animal tribes of Central America. It has no actual intrinsic value, it only has value in an economy that can ascribe and translate worth, and then turn that worth into some kind of labor.
Yep. There's a difference between being wealthy and simply having claim to a resource rich territory.
Hold on, The Inca and Maya and Aztecs all loved gold. They had very good metallurgry, but very little accessible iron. They (The Inca, at the very least) made do with very good alloys of silver, copper, tin, gold etc. Their bronzes were phenomenal for the time. What is strange to me is that they did very little oceanic exploration, considering the abundance of suitable timber.