None of these leftoid anti-White race traitors seem to be able to reconcile that in 100BC, the indigenous populations of the Americas were uncontacted. Sub-Saharan Africans were mostly uncontacted and any slavery at the time was Africans enslaving Africans and the slave trade was entirely limited to the Middle East.
And while the Greeks were building the Colossus of Rhodes, what were Africans doing? What were Indians doing? Nothing. They were an evolutionary dead end. This is over a thousand years before any of these claims of "stolen resources" and "genocide" and "slavery" could ever be used. Whites needed to invent transoceanic galleons before it was ever possible to do those things, meaning they already had infinitely surpassed the capabilities of any of these trash peoples. Then we're told that those galleons were the product of "stolen land" from a bunch of mindless savages who never once created a government.
No wonder the 1619 project is so sacred to them. It is literally central to their beliefs that world history only existed after the point where they could make these claims of persecution.
Romans built towering marble temples to Jupiter ar the same time that Africans were failing to even invent literacy.
We are not the same. It's not genocide when one species out-competes an inferior one. It's evolution.
And if we ever did carry out genocide, then why are there still mouthy ingrates alive to complain about it?
There’s a new theory that Africans “did all that” but since they had no writing it was all lost to history. Of course reading & writing is fundamental to civilization building so it’s easy to call bs on it. Fuck even the Aztecs & Incas had it which is why we remember them.
I think there's one in the Pharaonic Royal Line who's a Nubian, but given how stylized the art of that era is-- he'd be presented as black in murals by virtue of being from there alone. Plus, 1 in 4000 years hardly counts as a trend.
Jesus Christ those comments.
None of these leftoid anti-White race traitors seem to be able to reconcile that in 100BC, the indigenous populations of the Americas were uncontacted. Sub-Saharan Africans were mostly uncontacted and any slavery at the time was Africans enslaving Africans and the slave trade was entirely limited to the Middle East.
And while the Greeks were building the Colossus of Rhodes, what were Africans doing? What were Indians doing? Nothing. They were an evolutionary dead end. This is over a thousand years before any of these claims of "stolen resources" and "genocide" and "slavery" could ever be used. Whites needed to invent transoceanic galleons before it was ever possible to do those things, meaning they already had infinitely surpassed the capabilities of any of these trash peoples. Then we're told that those galleons were the product of "stolen land" from a bunch of mindless savages who never once created a government.
No wonder the 1619 project is so sacred to them. It is literally central to their beliefs that world history only existed after the point where they could make these claims of persecution.
Romans built towering marble temples to Jupiter ar the same time that Africans were failing to even invent literacy.
We are not the same. It's not genocide when one species out-competes an inferior one. It's evolution.
And if we ever did carry out genocide, then why are there still mouthy ingrates alive to complain about it?
There’s a new theory that Africans “did all that” but since they had no writing it was all lost to history. Of course reading & writing is fundamental to civilization building so it’s easy to call bs on it. Fuck even the Aztecs & Incas had it which is why we remember them.
They also claim Egyptian pharaohs were actually black as well.
I think there's one in the Pharaonic Royal Line who's a Nubian, but given how stylized the art of that era is-- he'd be presented as black in murals by virtue of being from there alone. Plus, 1 in 4000 years hardly counts as a trend.
Even the plural is a lie in "But muh Kangs!"