Anyway ... you are now resorting to fucking semantics ...
OWNERSHIP is separate from power. You can argue it's upstream from it, really, since an owner has rights over his own property.
And this is plain fucking STUPID ... DOG LEVEL STUPID.
Ownership means nothing without the power to back up your fucking claim.
the monarch doesn't own the entirety of the means of production
BWAHAHAHHA ... the eintirety ? The soviets also didn't ? Were they not socialist enough ? Fuck me i'm pretty sure the North Koreans have some small scale smuggling and private shit going on ... Are they not socialist ?
So you just ousted yourself as a fucking socialist piece of shit ... because you agreed the EU is socialist ... YET they also don't literary own the entirety of the means of production.
SO PLEASE GO AHEAD AND EAT THE FUCKING SHIT ALONG WITH your ALT ... the elefant ... FUCKING socialist FAGGOTS licking yourselves up the ass .
Yep. EU's rotten-- fully committed to socialist redistribution, second only to making itself into a federal government by subverting the nations within it.
US has been going downhill since FDR's new deal grafted socialist systems into the republic. Arguably longer, if you want to count the consolidation of federal power over the states, under Lincoln as being against the founder's principles.
The question is WHY THE FUCK ... did the US help the fucking SOCIALIST PIECES OF FILTHY EUROPEAN SHIT ?
And why the FUCK aren't they left to crumble like the piece of shit that they are .
TentElephant :
Because Europe has been a US colony since 1945.
The US has an on-going military occupation of Europe. In a sane world, the nature of this relationship would be obvious to everyone.
Also, your username doesn't go far enough. In the Global American Empire(or GAE), the people own the means of production under a dictatorship of a proletarianized elite.
Poor little europeans ... the bad americans aren't letting them be more capitalist ... FUCK ME .
and then
Capitalism versuses communism is a false dichotomy.
Poor little europeans ... the bad americans aren't letting them be more capitalist ... FUCK ME .
Absolutely not an accurate summary of what he said. But hey-- tell me you can't parse complex English and nuance without explicitly saying so, why don't you?
Capitalism versuses communism is a false dichotomy.
=))
Sure sounds like a capitalist to me =))
He's pointing out that if you let yourself be penned in by a capitalist vs. socialist/communist paradigm, you've already lost. The types pushing the great reset are big on using the Hegelian dialectic to shift what's acceptable to talk about. They control both opposing viewpoints, then manage the process of synthesizing them-- and they get the results they want most of the time.
It's a big part of why we have hybrid capitalist-socialist systems in most of the countries of the world, with more socialism getting added to the mix over time.
Words have meanings outside of what you believe them to mean.
EXACTLY !
Having the people believe that ONE FAMILY is the ONLY ONE to BIRTH their LEADER ( and owner of their country )... IS THE ULTIMATE EXPRESSION OF SOCIALISM and the ultimate dismissal of the individual !
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the community as a whole, usually through a centralized government.
monarchy [ mon-er-kee ]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
A monarchist system needn't be socialist, just by definitions alone.
You are a national socialist ... i ain't any kind of socialist =))
I know damn well you aren't a socialist. Reread what I said. =))
https://www.highlandtitles.com/blog/this-land-aint-your-land-part-1/
Anyway ... you are now resorting to fucking semantics ...
And this is plain fucking STUPID ... DOG LEVEL STUPID.
Ownership means nothing without the power to back up your fucking claim.
BWAHAHAHHA ... the eintirety ? The soviets also didn't ? Were they not socialist enough ? Fuck me i'm pretty sure the North Koreans have some small scale smuggling and private shit going on ... Are they not socialist ?
So you just ousted yourself as a fucking socialist piece of shit ... because you agreed the EU is socialist ... YET they also don't literary own the entirety of the means of production.
SO PLEASE GO AHEAD AND EAT THE FUCKING SHIT ALONG WITH your ALT ... the elefant ... FUCKING socialist FAGGOTS licking yourselves up the ass .
</shrug> I tried.
Go felate yourself over your "victory"
Oh i did :) so if you aren't his alt ... do you agree the EU is socialist ? Is the US turning more socialist by each passing year ?
Yep. EU's rotten-- fully committed to socialist redistribution, second only to making itself into a federal government by subverting the nations within it.
US has been going downhill since FDR's new deal grafted socialist systems into the republic. Arguably longer, if you want to count the consolidation of federal power over the states, under Lincoln as being against the founder's principles.
ME:
TentElephant :
Poor little europeans ... the bad americans aren't letting them be more capitalist ... FUCK ME .
and then
=))
Sure sounds like a capitalist to me =))
Also, for the fourth or fifth time, I ain't his alt.
So why are you quoting him when I asked you what I said?
Absolutely not an accurate summary of what he said. But hey-- tell me you can't parse complex English and nuance without explicitly saying so, why don't you?
He's pointing out that if you let yourself be penned in by a capitalist vs. socialist/communist paradigm, you've already lost. The types pushing the great reset are big on using the Hegelian dialectic to shift what's acceptable to talk about. They control both opposing viewpoints, then manage the process of synthesizing them-- and they get the results they want most of the time.
It's a big part of why we have hybrid capitalist-socialist systems in most of the countries of the world, with more socialism getting added to the mix over time.
EXACTLY !
Having the people believe that ONE FAMILY is the ONLY ONE to BIRTH their LEADER ( and owner of their country )... IS THE ULTIMATE EXPRESSION OF SOCIALISM and the ultimate dismissal of the individual !
How could you even say it's NOT SOCIALISM ?
socialism [ soh-shuh-liz-uhm ]
noun
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the community as a whole, usually through a centralized government.
monarchy [ mon-er-kee ]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
A monarchist system needn't be socialist, just by definitions alone.
No it'S PURE SOCIALISM !
Words have meanings outside of what you believe them to mean.
Monarchism. Isn't. Socialism.