You certainly are conferring a great many motivations onto me that I never expressed nor possessed.

To recap, you said you were a blackpilled. I accused you of being a performative nihilist. After a few comments, you eventually balked at ever being accused of expressing nihilism. If anything, it looks like I'm reading you quite well.

The trans phenomenon is a direct result of women's unfettered sense of entitlement

You are downplaying liberalism's role in "liberating" people from social norms and nature itself.

Once again, the social contract that you appear to be holding up as an alternative to what you term "liberalism" no longer exists.

It's one of many social norms liberalism destroyed, yes.

Women are no longer entitled to men's protection in any societal sense. What have they done to earn it?

This is a low agency take. Most people, especially women, are NPCs, i.e. sheep. If you are as high agency as I suspect that you imagine yourself to be, then it is your responsibility to herd the sheep away from cliffs and wolves and to fence them in. You and the others like this are in search of an excuse to check out, to embrace being sheep. This is why I said, "get ensnared in pro-ruling class ideology" above. The checked-out man is non-threatening.

What motivates you to take that position is your desire for women to like you.

Nah. I don't want to be overrun with trans kids and mass scale grooming operations out of some idiotic notion that this constitutes revenge on the wamen.

taking part in this battle by your insistence that I'm somehow morally deficient for refusing to do so

I'm not here to change your mind, merely expose your liberal adolescence for what it is.

By the way, you are all about going on strike in your relationships with women or anything that can be construed as protecting them. Would you support a strike of all male workers until the corporations take your side, throw their money around, and abolish tranny shit and also put wamen back in the kitchen?