If there's ever a company I'd want to see fall, it's Mastercard.
To be clear, that's because you found some woman at a high position when it cracked down on Pornhub for child porn, and concluded that it must be that this woman is doing that in order to help OnlyFans thots, right?
I say without irony that your explanation for events are the best. Why? Most explanations for events are wrong. Yours are at least entertaining.
Google is a very close second and P&G is a distant third.
Insofar as who is actually doing damage, your priorities are not exactly right. While P&G should definitely fail, it's nowhere near a priority but for the fact that you are mad about its stupid ads.
I use American Express for now.
Pretty sure it had some CRT training a while back
I'm glad people are finally getting skeptical of the card companies.
No, it's for that same woman being the chair of a really shady ESG fund, being the first person to ever suggest vaccine passports for Covid and constantly showing up as the host of strange women's events backed by the same list of shady organizations every time.
I believe P&G is being used as a fund to reward people who push feminist agendas. Look at their list of brand ambassadors lately. People like Raheem Sterling (British footballer and BLM advocate) started appearing in their ads constantly - payment for services to the regime.
No, it's for that same woman being the chair of a really shady ESG fund, being the first person to ever suggest vaccine passports for Covid and constantly showing up as the host of strange women's events backed by the same list of shady organizations every time.
The first and third thing aren't really out of the ordinary. Can you show me the vaccine passport thing? Is my memory failing, or were you mad at her even before the whole corona thing?
I believe P&G is being used as a fund to reward people who push feminist agendas.
Don't you think it's just a tiny bit unlikely for a profit-seeking corporation?
Forced neutrality.
I mean, why not go all the way and force them to support what is good and right? Question is how we get there, not what is desirable.
I've been mad at her since KIA2 was on Reddit. She was a prominent backer of the Women's Equality Party in England and had shady ties back then, attending women only conferences where journalists were banned. Before Boris Johnson slipped out #MoreFeminineWay, I considered her to be the likely ringleader of all the feminist efforts in England.
I'll find it, it's pretty old now.
Not really. Paying a few shills with advertising roles to advance the feminist agenda will barely show on their quarterly reports.
We get there by repealing 1st Amendment protections for companies over a certain market cap.
If there's ever a company I'd want to see fall, it's Mastercard. Google is a very close second and P&G is a distant third.
I use American Express for now.
I'm glad people are finally getting skeptical of the card companies.
To be clear, that's because you found some woman at a high position when it cracked down on Pornhub for child porn, and concluded that it must be that this woman is doing that in order to help OnlyFans thots, right?
I say without irony that your explanation for events are the best. Why? Most explanations for events are wrong. Yours are at least entertaining.
Insofar as who is actually doing damage, your priorities are not exactly right. While P&G should definitely fail, it's nowhere near a priority but for the fact that you are mad about its stupid ads.
Pretty sure it had some CRT training a while back
Question is: what can be done about them?
No, it's for that same woman being the chair of a really shady ESG fund, being the first person to ever suggest vaccine passports for Covid and constantly showing up as the host of strange women's events backed by the same list of shady organizations every time.
In fact, she's hosting one in the next few days.
https://scored.co/c/feminism/p/15HIFLbv4G/so-the-un-is-hosting-some-kind-o/c
I believe P&G is being used as a fund to reward people who push feminist agendas. Look at their list of brand ambassadors lately. People like Raheem Sterling (British footballer and BLM advocate) started appearing in their ads constantly - payment for services to the regime.
You're correct, but the other options are worse.
Forced neutrality.
The first and third thing aren't really out of the ordinary. Can you show me the vaccine passport thing? Is my memory failing, or were you mad at her even before the whole corona thing?
Don't you think it's just a tiny bit unlikely for a profit-seeking corporation?
I mean, why not go all the way and force them to support what is good and right? Question is how we get there, not what is desirable.
I've been mad at her since KIA2 was on Reddit. She was a prominent backer of the Women's Equality Party in England and had shady ties back then, attending women only conferences where journalists were banned. Before Boris Johnson slipped out #MoreFeminineWay, I considered her to be the likely ringleader of all the feminist efforts in England.
I'll find it, it's pretty old now.
Not really. Paying a few shills with advertising roles to advance the feminist agenda will barely show on their quarterly reports.
We get there by repealing 1st Amendment protections for companies over a certain market cap.