No, it's for that same woman being the chair of a really shady ESG fund, being the first person to ever suggest vaccine passports for Covid and constantly showing up as the host of strange women's events backed by the same list of shady organizations every time.
The first and third thing aren't really out of the ordinary. Can you show me the vaccine passport thing? Is my memory failing, or were you mad at her even before the whole corona thing?
I believe P&G is being used as a fund to reward people who push feminist agendas.
Don't you think it's just a tiny bit unlikely for a profit-seeking corporation?
Forced neutrality.
I mean, why not go all the way and force them to support what is good and right? Question is how we get there, not what is desirable.
I've been mad at her since KIA2 was on Reddit. She was a prominent backer of the Women's Equality Party in England and had shady ties back then, attending women only conferences where journalists were banned. Before Boris Johnson slipped out #MoreFeminineWay, I considered her to be the likely ringleader of all the feminist efforts in England.
I'll find it, it's pretty old now.
Not really. Paying a few shills with advertising roles to advance the feminist agenda will barely show on their quarterly reports.
We get there by repealing 1st Amendment protections for companies over a certain market cap.
The first and third thing aren't really out of the ordinary. Can you show me the vaccine passport thing? Is my memory failing, or were you mad at her even before the whole corona thing?
Don't you think it's just a tiny bit unlikely for a profit-seeking corporation?
I mean, why not go all the way and force them to support what is good and right? Question is how we get there, not what is desirable.
I've been mad at her since KIA2 was on Reddit. She was a prominent backer of the Women's Equality Party in England and had shady ties back then, attending women only conferences where journalists were banned. Before Boris Johnson slipped out #MoreFeminineWay, I considered her to be the likely ringleader of all the feminist efforts in England.
I'll find it, it's pretty old now.
Not really. Paying a few shills with advertising roles to advance the feminist agenda will barely show on their quarterly reports.
We get there by repealing 1st Amendment protections for companies over a certain market cap.
Forget about it. If that is the case, then I'm convinced that she is odious.
Though I never really doubted that she is, only your idea that she is obsessed with helping OnlyFans. Or that it is her doing to sanction Pornhub.
She is likely just an apparatchik, not any sort of leader.
Just overturn Citizens United and you will be there. Much easier than your... constitutional amendment.