This is pretty much the same thing on the other side. Where they want me to completely condemn Ukraine and stand with Russia because they have some retarded neonazis their ranks.
I haven't seen this particular false dichotomy being pushed.
I've seen people who are sympathetic to Russia because they're mounting regional resistance to Western/Globalist expansion. I've seen people voice concerns that Ukraine is too corrupt to be worth the struggle bringing them into NATO would provoke. I've seen people try to smear anyone with Russian sympathies as FSB shills, or supporters of the Chechen Islamic volunteer brigade.
I think there's a lot of room for all combatants to be in the wrong here, and more than enough propaganda to deepen the moral fog when you try to judge the issue.
I know you've been wading hip-deep in flamewars on this one, so where did you see a demand for you to have that kind of black or white thinking on the subject?
It's not easy to see context through the flames-- how far back should I be looking? 90%+ of your last three pages or so of post history have been abbreviated replies or demands for an evidentiary standard you'd need to violate your security clearance to provide, RE: the Russian bioweapons claim.
I don't see any of your replies to demanding you support Russia because Azov battalion. I admit that your vociferous opposition to 'stormcuckery' probably provoked such rhetoric at some point. Something along the lines of challenging your moral fiber because now that there's actual neo-nazis, you support their side in the form of Azov Battalion/Ukraine?
Context on jester? Don’t bother. He’s larping as a member of mossad’s online troll division for people who are too stupid and ugly to meaningfully serve the cause.
This is pretty much the same thing on the other side. Where they want me to completely condemn Ukraine and stand with Russia because they have some retarded neonazis their ranks.
It is all so very tiresome.
I haven't seen this particular false dichotomy being pushed.
I've seen people who are sympathetic to Russia because they're mounting regional resistance to Western/Globalist expansion. I've seen people voice concerns that Ukraine is too corrupt to be worth the struggle bringing them into NATO would provoke. I've seen people try to smear anyone with Russian sympathies as FSB shills, or supporters of the Chechen Islamic volunteer brigade.
I think there's a lot of room for all combatants to be in the wrong here, and more than enough propaganda to deepen the moral fog when you try to judge the issue.
I know you've been wading hip-deep in flamewars on this one, so where did you see a demand for you to have that kind of black or white thinking on the subject?
You should see my post history, it will be easier. They tried to smear Ukraine and attempting to make me show support for russia because of Azov.
The excuses are that they represent such a large amount of Ukrainians, to many other things.
I'm looking through your post history.
It's not easy to see context through the flames-- how far back should I be looking? 90%+ of your last three pages or so of post history have been abbreviated replies or demands for an evidentiary standard you'd need to violate your security clearance to provide, RE: the Russian bioweapons claim.
I don't see any of your replies to demanding you support Russia because Azov battalion. I admit that your vociferous opposition to 'stormcuckery' probably provoked such rhetoric at some point. Something along the lines of challenging your moral fiber because now that there's actual neo-nazis, you support their side in the form of Azov Battalion/Ukraine?
How far back should I slog for context?
Context on jester? Don’t bother. He’s larping as a member of mossad’s online troll division for people who are too stupid and ugly to meaningfully serve the cause.