Well if we ban babysitters we have now banned all women from the workplace, since they are now returned to the house to do it themselves. After all, since you've also banned most teachers we can't use public education to do it anymore either. So in one quick swoop your little plan now requires restructuring all of society and immensely downsizing the population to deal with losing half the workforce.
Well done. Now tell me how you have a totally realistic plan for that too.
Wow, you just described a fucking babysitter. The thing you just one comment ago wanted to get rid of.
Because that's what they do. They take care of your children for 8~ hours a day to allow an extra parent to work, which for various reasons, is necessary to maintain any quality of life for a family.
Well done, you missed my point so entirely you contradicted yours in attempting a weak emotional goalpost move.
And the vast majority to an almost monopoly of them are women. Which in effect bans them, because men don't want that job to an notable extent. Whether that's by instinctual desire, fear of pedo accusations, or just not wanting to they don't go into these fields. As you should know from feminist failings, you can't just say 'put more X in this field" and it magically just works out.
The only way to entice them into it (better pay) would make it unaffordable to nearly all families. Its already barely affordable to most families, and now you will make sure it is only for the upper class.
And even if they can afford it, now there are significantly less of them in general, meaning they can charge even more absurd prices due to absurd demand and there won't be nearly enough to cover all of society's needs.
Again, try to actually think of your plans beyond the emotional Steps 1 and 2, because they fall apart quick by Step 3: Consequences.
Well if we ban babysitters we have now banned all women from the workplace, since they are now returned to the house to do it themselves. After all, since you've also banned most teachers we can't use public education to do it anymore either. So in one quick swoop your little plan now requires restructuring all of society and immensely downsizing the population to deal with losing half the workforce.
Well done. Now tell me how you have a totally realistic plan for that too.
Be real, do teachers actually do anything that the average person can't? A teaching certification is a joke.
Wow, you just described a fucking babysitter. The thing you just one comment ago wanted to get rid of.
Because that's what they do. They take care of your children for 8~ hours a day to allow an extra parent to work, which for various reasons, is necessary to maintain any quality of life for a family.
Well done, you missed my point so entirely you contradicted yours in attempting a weak emotional goalpost move.
I never said I was banning them, I said I would ban women from that role.
How hard can it be to train unemployed men to teach kids 4+7?
And the vast majority to an almost monopoly of them are women. Which in effect bans them, because men don't want that job to an notable extent. Whether that's by instinctual desire, fear of pedo accusations, or just not wanting to they don't go into these fields. As you should know from feminist failings, you can't just say 'put more X in this field" and it magically just works out.
The only way to entice them into it (better pay) would make it unaffordable to nearly all families. Its already barely affordable to most families, and now you will make sure it is only for the upper class.
And even if they can afford it, now there are significantly less of them in general, meaning they can charge even more absurd prices due to absurd demand and there won't be nearly enough to cover all of society's needs.
Again, try to actually think of your plans beyond the emotional Steps 1 and 2, because they fall apart quick by Step 3: Consequences.