That's your issue, you think that them taking power from the enemy would be an improvement.
No, it doesn't. If we're winning, they're just trying to save their skin, if we're losing, they're trying to ensure our loss through treachery. There's no benefit to offering the enemy redemption.
That's your issue, you think that them taking power from the enemy would be an improvement.
Yes, I think an enemy with 0% power taking power from an enemy with 100% power is to my advantage.
No, it doesn't. If we're winning, they're just trying to save their skin, if we're losing, they're trying to ensure our loss through treachery. There's no benefit to offering the enemy redemption.
If you're losing, that means you need to attract more support, dummy. But if you are winning, you will get opportunists, so at some point you will have to stop being forgiving.`
Why you can't understand :
A - Feminists are irredeemable scum by their own ideology's admission.
B - TERFs are also like this, regardless of them being inadvertently right on one thing due to their hatred of anything male.
C - A path to redemption for them serves absolutely no purpose for us.
Ideologies don't 'admit' things, and many feminists have indeed been redeemed.
I literally don't care. I care only that they fight against wokies. What happens afterwards can be decided later.
Depends on whether we are winning or losing.
Define "redeemed".
That's your issue, you think that them taking power from the enemy would be an improvement.
No, it doesn't. If we're winning, they're just trying to save their skin, if we're losing, they're trying to ensure our loss through treachery. There's no benefit to offering the enemy redemption.
You used it yourself.
Yes, I think an enemy with 0% power taking power from an enemy with 100% power is to my advantage.
If you're losing, that means you need to attract more support, dummy. But if you are winning, you will get opportunists, so at some point you will have to stop being forgiving.`