That's your issue, you think that them taking power from the enemy would be an improvement.
No, it doesn't. If we're winning, they're just trying to save their skin, if we're losing, they're trying to ensure our loss through treachery. There's no benefit to offering the enemy redemption.
That's your issue, you think that them taking power from the enemy would be an improvement.
Yes, I think an enemy with 0% power taking power from an enemy with 100% power is to my advantage.
No, it doesn't. If we're winning, they're just trying to save their skin, if we're losing, they're trying to ensure our loss through treachery. There's no benefit to offering the enemy redemption.
If you're losing, that means you need to attract more support, dummy. But if you are winning, you will get opportunists, so at some point you will have to stop being forgiving.`
Define "redeemed".
That's your issue, you think that them taking power from the enemy would be an improvement.
No, it doesn't. If we're winning, they're just trying to save their skin, if we're losing, they're trying to ensure our loss through treachery. There's no benefit to offering the enemy redemption.
You used it yourself.
Yes, I think an enemy with 0% power taking power from an enemy with 100% power is to my advantage.
If you're losing, that means you need to attract more support, dummy. But if you are winning, you will get opportunists, so at some point you will have to stop being forgiving.`