If you think she isn't having them keep an eye on everyone who looks at her as the puppet master of the failing UK...
I'm not confirming anything. I'm just saying I wouldn't have said that because it would be a ban. Considering Carrie's crusade against "incel violence" took monitoring off a convicted extremist who later killed an MP, I don't think I even need to say anything on the topic of it being a bad idea. Not as if she cares, men are below her anyway, in her mind.
To what?
Like I said at the beginning, I bet she has her agents report to her on whether people have worked out what's going on yet.
If you think she isn't having them keep an eye on everyone who looks at her as the puppet master of the failing UK...
I thought you said you 'knew' it. Seems like standards for what counts as 'knowledge' are different when you are speaking.
I'm not confirming anything. I'm just saying I wouldn't have said that because it would be a ban.
It is a confirmation, otherwise you'd have said "No, I don't believe that". You do.
Considering Carrie's crusade against "incel violence" took monitoring off a convicted extremist who later killed an MP, I don't think I even need to say anything on the topic of it being a bad idea. Not as if she cares, men are below her anyway, in her mind.
I guess now you can read minds from a distance as well. But feel free to show me that it was a crusade against 'incel violence' that took that terrorist from off the monitoring - that would be nice ammunition. While you're at it, you could show that the concubine was responsible for it.
To what?
To seeing things as they are. If it weren't for your blinding hatred for the females of the opposite sex.
Like I said at the beginning, I bet she has her agents report to her on whether people have worked out what's going on yet.
Smart, you're now making bets that cannot be proven false, as opposed to your previous ones which you all lost.
If anything AoV at this point it looks like you are holding Imp to different standards, not that imp is using different standards.
If anyone else said things in a slightly hyperbolic manner, you seem to interpret them correctly and understand the meaning of their messages.
With Imp, you take him stone cold literally and nit pick.
It is PROVEN that governments monitor websites. Is it questionable that they're checking this specific one? Sure. But that doesn't refute imps point that they can and likely do.
Just like you're implying they're using human man power to monitor this and other sites, when you know full well they can just use scrapers.
You don't need to read minds either to make a good estimate of someone's behaviour. Carries behaviour has long been antimale, this is very apparent when you note her associations and meeting points. Much like we don't have to read minds to know that Imp will see the worst in women ( right or not) and that you will be right there nitpicking and cherry picking (again right or not).
If you think she isn't having them keep an eye on everyone who looks at her as the puppet master of the failing UK...
I'm not confirming anything. I'm just saying I wouldn't have said that because it would be a ban. Considering Carrie's crusade against "incel violence" took monitoring off a convicted extremist who later killed an MP, I don't think I even need to say anything on the topic of it being a bad idea. Not as if she cares, men are below her anyway, in her mind.
To what?
Like I said at the beginning, I bet she has her agents report to her on whether people have worked out what's going on yet.
I thought you said you 'knew' it. Seems like standards for what counts as 'knowledge' are different when you are speaking.
It is a confirmation, otherwise you'd have said "No, I don't believe that". You do.
I guess now you can read minds from a distance as well. But feel free to show me that it was a crusade against 'incel violence' that took that terrorist from off the monitoring - that would be nice ammunition. While you're at it, you could show that the concubine was responsible for it.
To seeing things as they are. If it weren't for your blinding hatred for the females of the opposite sex.
Smart, you're now making bets that cannot be proven false, as opposed to your previous ones which you all lost.
If anything AoV at this point it looks like you are holding Imp to different standards, not that imp is using different standards.
If anyone else said things in a slightly hyperbolic manner, you seem to interpret them correctly and understand the meaning of their messages.
With Imp, you take him stone cold literally and nit pick.
It is PROVEN that governments monitor websites. Is it questionable that they're checking this specific one? Sure. But that doesn't refute imps point that they can and likely do.
Just like you're implying they're using human man power to monitor this and other sites, when you know full well they can just use scrapers.
You don't need to read minds either to make a good estimate of someone's behaviour. Carries behaviour has long been antimale, this is very apparent when you note her associations and meeting points. Much like we don't have to read minds to know that Imp will see the worst in women ( right or not) and that you will be right there nitpicking and cherry picking (again right or not).