So, while I'm waiting for Horizon 5's Chinesium update to download, I might as well get this post written down.
I'm sure we all remember Piers Morgan, after his scathing criticism of Meghan Markle (she should be with Lewis Hamilton. Race grifter power couple) got him canceled almost entirely, to the point that he had to live off his book revenues.
Well, it's been a while since that, and he's been in the news for other, bootlicking reasons. Of course I'm talking about his pro-vax rants, of which I only have one to hand, the most recent.
Now, I'm going to change topic for a second here.
The Sun is a newspaper known for talking utter bullshit for many, many years. Their most well known lie was their defamation against football fans in the Hillsborough disaster.
This newspaper had a change of editor in 2020. A female editor, formerly editor of the celebrity gossip section, took over the whole thing.
Their coverage of the pandemic always followed government narratives, especially when vaccinations became available. It was eventually revealed that they were working with the government to promote getting jabbed.
Let's move on to something else, it'll all connect in the end. Remember the incel shooting in the UK recently and how nobody saw the evidence that he was an incel except The Sun's female editor?
Right, now go back to their connection with the government, remember the Online Harms Bill will include "misogynistic hate speech."
But what does this have to do with Piers Morgan?
Well...guess who just hired him? The Sun.
So, what looks to have happened is he became a heretic for criticising Markle, then offered to shill the vax for his feminist masters to restart his career. Anything he says should be considered official speech of the More Feminine Way, because all he is, is a feminist Der Sturmer writer.
They did.
He’s back, in Pog form.
It is interesting that you don't even mention its smears against Johnny Depp.
No, but I do remember you panicking about that 'male curfew' that would definitely be enacted.
Jesus Christ man, how can you take yourself seriously?
Literally the whole UK media did that.
Give it time.
What do you call someone who sells out their principles to shill poison for a state-backed propaganda mouthpiece?
The Sun was especially awful.
I think men will be OK. You're on your 7th prediction about Kim Potter, the first 5 having been refuted.
Streicher did not sell out his principles, those were his principles.
Female editor, what do you expect. It was bait, IMO. They wanted him to sue because a UK court is rigged in women's favor and now legally Amber is the victim. Worked out pretty fucking well.
You keep bringing that up like it proves anything. How many people have gone against me and been wrong?
I think you missed my point. It's like a Resistance member defecting to write for Der Sturmer. This man was on the correct side before.
Eh, that doesn't really benefit The Sun or its officials.
The issue is not that you get stuff wrong. The issue is that you get stuff wrong and then move seamlessly to the next infallible prediction made with complete confidence, even about the same subject.
If I were serially wrong like that, I'd at least do some introspection about why I get things wrong so much.
He was always a loose cannon: good some of the time and bad some of the time.
If I wrote that vaccines are very good for people in risk groups, like the elderly and those with underlying health conditions (which is what I believe), would that make me like that too?
But The Sun is a government mouthpiece. It doesn't matter.
I don't need to review why I get things wrong, I know why. I always predict things will get worse faster than they actually do. I'm naturally pessimistic.
Yes. By now everyone should know the vaccines are more useless than a marriage and about as likely to end in tears.
So of course, you know exactly why you're wrong all the time while being absolutely confident. I mean, there's no way you'd be wrong about that too, right? Gotta love your persona. You seem to be completely impervious to reason.
So which one of the ConPro mods are you? Or are you just a feminist shill who forgot to age the account before going full retard?
So am I, but I have more of a grip on reality. Maybe it's lack of historical knowledge or knowledge of human nature on your part.
I'd say protection against hospitalization and death is pretty good, even if temporary, for those gravely at risk. So go ahead and call me a Der Stuermer employee then. Not gonna change my mind.
Human nature says none of what's happening now should happen, but it is.
Israel is on their 5th shot, you know.