Herself. Male feminists don't exist. There are just blackmailed men and brainwashed men.
By that standard, there's also no female feminists - as they are all brainwashed.
Also, I'm sick of this ridiculous deflection, like Karen from 4 doors down is the arbiter of what feminism is and not the academic and political leaders.
Yeah, that's the problem with ideologies. Just because they share a name, does not mean that all people following them have the same views. There are people who call themselves socialists but really are neoliberals.
If you consider yourself a feminist, you have to agree with them, and their position is that men need to be "reduced". Anything else is just lies and subterfuge.
Or else?
BTW, if the standard for what 'feminism' is is what 'academic and political leaders' scream, then that certainly will not be that your dick needs to be 'reduced'. Of the numerous feminists there, how many hold that view? Two that you found?
It's like saying you can be an anti-2A Republican, or a Democrat against abortion.
Of course you can be, there are many.
These are fundamental issues echoed by everyone with influence in their movement.
Since you believe that anyone calling himself a feminist wants to kill you, does this by analogy mean that you think anyone who calls himself a Republican is magically pro-2A?
That's an absurd claim. Brainwashing logic works when people are acting against their best interests, not out of self-importance.
All socialism leads to breadlines anyway, even the pyramid scheme that is the welfare state
BTW, if the standard for what 'feminism' is is what 'academic and political leaders' scream, then that certainly will not be that your dick needs to be 'reduced'.
I don't think anyone campaigns for reduced penis size.
Anyway, I've showed you the NYT praising Solanas before. I've showed you how the DNC invited a murderer to speak because they thought it would appeal to women. Gender Studies was created by a male genocide advocate. Women's Studies teaches based off the SCUM Manifesto.
Why don't we force politicians to condemn radical feminism like we do for "white supremacists" - because one controls the levers of power, and one is just a media bogeyman created by the former.
What you're saying is that they need to be even more blatant about what they support because it's not quite obvious enough.
Since you believe that anyone calling himself a feminist wants to kill you
Herself. Any man calling himself a feminist is just a brainwashed kid who never grew up or someone who trusted women too much and got blackmailed for it. Remember when Johnny Depp was a far-leftist? Yeah...we all know why now.
Does this by analogy mean that you think anyone who calls himself a Republican is magically pro-2A?
I mean, gun rights are a central part of being a Republican. I presume your argument is the worthless pieces of shit in Congress who capitulate over and over again?
That's an absurd claim. Brainwashing logic works when people are acting against their best interests, not out of self-importance.
Feminism is no more good for women than race-baiting is for blacks.
No one brainwashed me, nor did I ever act against my self-interest. I just lacked some knowledge, so feminism appeared more benign than the mainstream of it actually is. You assert that it's 'impossible' for a woman to be like that and that they must be out to kill you. Now that is paranoia.
Anyway, I've showed you the NYT praising Solanas before. I've showed you how the DNC invited a murderer to speak because they thought it would appeal to women. Gender Studies was created by a male genocide advocate. Women's Studies teaches based off the SCUM Manifesto.
And this proves that your neighbor Karen who calls herself a feminist because she is under the misprision that women are paid less, LITERALLY WANTS TO MURDER YOU... how?
Why don't we force politicians to condemn radical feminism like we do for "white supremacists" - because one controls the levers of power, and one is just a media bogeyman created by the former.
You almost got it right again. It's because they "have no enemies to the left". Same reason why leftists are not forced to condemn communism, or BLM trash the Waukesha murderer.
What you're saying is that they need to be even more blatant about what they support because it's not quite obvious enough.
Considering the fact that you are the one person on the planet who does believe that these lines you have arbitrarily connected are 'obvious', well yeah.
Herself. Any man calling himself a feminist is just a brainwashed kid who never grew up or someone who trusted women too much and got blackmailed for it. Remember when Johnny Depp was a far-leftist? Yeah...we all know why now.
Shall I make the stupid mistake of asking whether you have any evidence for this?
I mean, gun rights are a central part of being a Republican. I presume your argument is the worthless pieces of shit in Congress who capitulate over and over again?
BUT, BUT... they call themselves Republicans. Ergo, by your logic, it follows that they are 2A supporters. And everything else, apparently.
Based off what? Let's ignore that it's evil and makes people fucking hate them and let's also ignore the effects on everyone else.
Feminism absolutely is beneficial for women, it's an ideology of self-obsession, that you are superior because you were born a certain way. The fact that they support it shows that old tradcon thoughts of women being somehow less self-serving than the average person is completely incorrect. The hatred crushes the mental state of men and enables them to advance. It'd be like running the 100m but all the other competitors were kneecapped with a crowbar before the race. That's not to mention all the ways that they are given unfair advancement over more qualified and better candidates.
No, it shows that she is covering for people who do out of naked self-interest and a lack of care for literally anyone who isn't female. Also, that paragraph made me glad I don't live next to a woman.
Funny story, I wrote a post of the backstory of the Waukesha murderer. It's gone now, removed for breaking Rule 1, Rule 2 and Rule 16. All because I said the guy spent the last decade being fucked over by courts on behalf of women, then got told by a woman-led organization that it was all the fault of white people. If they hadn't, he probably would have plowed through a International Women's Day march.
It's not that I'm the only person who believes it. It's that I'm the only person keeping track.
His very fast and clearly orchestrated from above downfall?
When you're talking about people with power, it doesn't work like that. You're forgetting that plants exist who are meant to act in the interests of their handlers. cough Joni Ernst cough
Based off what? Let's ignore that it's evil and makes people fucking hate them and let's also ignore the effects on everyone else.
What? The question was not about whether the ideology is evil, it was about whether everyone who calls himself that WANTS TO KILL YOU.
Feminism absolutely is beneficial for women, it's an ideology of self-obsession, that you are superior because you were born a certain way. The fact that they support it shows that old tradcon thoughts of women being somehow less self-serving than the average person is completely incorrect.
Feminism does absolutely nothing for the average woman, and a lot for rich women of the upper strata. There are no quotas in ordinary jobs, they exist in higher echelons. So yeah.
The hatred crushes the mental state of men
If you're that pathetic, you deserve to be crushed.
No, it shows that she is covering for people who do out of naked self-interest and a lack of care for literally anyone who isn't female. Also, that paragraph made me glad I don't live next to a woman.
It's touching that you think they care about anyone who is female. But so you admit that someone who calls himself (and yes, I use the generic he) does not want to literally kill you. You now claim that he will do it 'out of naked self-interest'. How does that apply to someone who has been deceived about something like the 'wage gap'?
Funny story, I wrote a post of the backstory of the Waukesha murderer. It's gone now, removed for breaking Rule 1, Rule 2 and Rule 16. All because I said the guy spent the last decade being fucked over by courts on behalf of women, then got told by a woman-led organization that it was all the fault of white people. If they hadn't, he probably would have plowed through a International Women's Day march.
Not very funny, it shows a disturbing amount of obsession.
It's not that I'm the only person who believes it. It's that I'm the only person keeping track.
I guess the geniuses who told you that Sarah Everhard didn't exist agree with you. Show me anyone with a brain who does.
His very fast and clearly orchestrated from above downfall?
Wait, so they were 'blackmailing' him to be far-left, so he was far-left, and then they destroyed him anyway. That's not what blackmail is, friend.
When you're talking about people with power, it doesn't work like that. You're forgetting that plants exist who are meant to act in the interests of their handlers. cough Joni Ernst cough
I remember when you were absolutely sure that Murkowski and Collins would vote for convict Trump over the Ukraine thing. When it was Romney, not a peep from you. Not female enough.
By that standard, there's also no female feminists - as they are all brainwashed.
Yeah, that's the problem with ideologies. Just because they share a name, does not mean that all people following them have the same views. There are people who call themselves socialists but really are neoliberals.
Or else?
BTW, if the standard for what 'feminism' is is what 'academic and political leaders' scream, then that certainly will not be that your dick needs to be 'reduced'. Of the numerous feminists there, how many hold that view? Two that you found?
Of course you can be, there are many.
Since you believe that anyone calling himself a feminist wants to kill you, does this by analogy mean that you think anyone who calls himself a Republican is magically pro-2A?
That's an absurd claim. Brainwashing logic works when people are acting against their best interests, not out of self-importance.
All socialism leads to breadlines anyway, even the pyramid scheme that is the welfare state
I don't think anyone campaigns for reduced penis size.
Anyway, I've showed you the NYT praising Solanas before. I've showed you how the DNC invited a murderer to speak because they thought it would appeal to women. Gender Studies was created by a male genocide advocate. Women's Studies teaches based off the SCUM Manifesto.
Why don't we force politicians to condemn radical feminism like we do for "white supremacists" - because one controls the levers of power, and one is just a media bogeyman created by the former.
What you're saying is that they need to be even more blatant about what they support because it's not quite obvious enough.
Herself. Any man calling himself a feminist is just a brainwashed kid who never grew up or someone who trusted women too much and got blackmailed for it. Remember when Johnny Depp was a far-leftist? Yeah...we all know why now.
I mean, gun rights are a central part of being a Republican. I presume your argument is the worthless pieces of shit in Congress who capitulate over and over again?
Feminism is no more good for women than race-baiting is for blacks.
No one brainwashed me, nor did I ever act against my self-interest. I just lacked some knowledge, so feminism appeared more benign than the mainstream of it actually is. You assert that it's 'impossible' for a woman to be like that and that they must be out to kill you. Now that is paranoia.
And this proves that your neighbor Karen who calls herself a feminist because she is under the misprision that women are paid less, LITERALLY WANTS TO MURDER YOU... how?
You almost got it right again. It's because they "have no enemies to the left". Same reason why leftists are not forced to condemn communism, or BLM trash the Waukesha murderer.
Considering the fact that you are the one person on the planet who does believe that these lines you have arbitrarily connected are 'obvious', well yeah.
Shall I make the stupid mistake of asking whether you have any evidence for this?
BUT, BUT... they call themselves Republicans. Ergo, by your logic, it follows that they are 2A supporters. And everything else, apparently.
Based off what? Let's ignore that it's evil and makes people fucking hate them and let's also ignore the effects on everyone else.
Feminism absolutely is beneficial for women, it's an ideology of self-obsession, that you are superior because you were born a certain way. The fact that they support it shows that old tradcon thoughts of women being somehow less self-serving than the average person is completely incorrect. The hatred crushes the mental state of men and enables them to advance. It'd be like running the 100m but all the other competitors were kneecapped with a crowbar before the race. That's not to mention all the ways that they are given unfair advancement over more qualified and better candidates.
No, it shows that she is covering for people who do out of naked self-interest and a lack of care for literally anyone who isn't female. Also, that paragraph made me glad I don't live next to a woman.
Funny story, I wrote a post of the backstory of the Waukesha murderer. It's gone now, removed for breaking Rule 1, Rule 2 and Rule 16. All because I said the guy spent the last decade being fucked over by courts on behalf of women, then got told by a woman-led organization that it was all the fault of white people. If they hadn't, he probably would have plowed through a International Women's Day march.
It's not that I'm the only person who believes it. It's that I'm the only person keeping track.
His very fast and clearly orchestrated from above downfall?
When you're talking about people with power, it doesn't work like that. You're forgetting that plants exist who are meant to act in the interests of their handlers. cough Joni Ernst cough
What? The question was not about whether the ideology is evil, it was about whether everyone who calls himself that WANTS TO KILL YOU.
Feminism does absolutely nothing for the average woman, and a lot for rich women of the upper strata. There are no quotas in ordinary jobs, they exist in higher echelons. So yeah.
If you're that pathetic, you deserve to be crushed.
It's touching that you think they care about anyone who is female. But so you admit that someone who calls himself (and yes, I use the generic he) does not want to literally kill you. You now claim that he will do it 'out of naked self-interest'. How does that apply to someone who has been deceived about something like the 'wage gap'?
Not very funny, it shows a disturbing amount of obsession.
I guess the geniuses who told you that Sarah Everhard didn't exist agree with you. Show me anyone with a brain who does.
Wait, so they were 'blackmailing' him to be far-left, so he was far-left, and then they destroyed him anyway. That's not what blackmail is, friend.
I remember when you were absolutely sure that Murkowski and Collins would vote for convict Trump over the Ukraine thing. When it was Romney, not a peep from you. Not female enough.