No, I asked you a very simple question, which you couldn't answer. Even assuming that the idiots showing up there (1) knew Donna Hylton (2) knew what she had done (3) knew that she would be speaking AND (4) approved of it, how does their presence say anything about the rest of them that did not show up?
It's not immune. It just takes actual proof, actual changes in behavior, not just "I'm not like them!"
Eh, here's suspecting that you'll be saying: "IT'S A PLOT TO MAKE US THINK THEY'RE OK WHEN THEY'RE NOT!"
What do you think of Finland and Denmark having female PMs who abolished all coronavirus rules? A plot to kill you?
In men, they look for socialists.
Is there anything you say that is actually based on evidence?
Because they're still allied with that ideology after it?
Why are you still allied with hating women after Marc Lepine?
I think it's a largely economic move, their economy probably couldn't handle a longer period of restrictions.
So 'the economy' could handle a 2 year lockdown intended to kill you, but far less damaging rules aimed at the unvaccinated (intended to kill you, of course) was something it could not handle.
Makes perfect sense. At least have a better excuse, like "these female leaders know men are more likely to die from Covid so this is their plan to kill us".
Supposing for a moment that this million to a man want to see men die, how exactly would this group be representative for those who did not show up?
It just means that you've come to a conclusion that is immune to any evidence of refutation. That's why you keep getting stuff wrong.
A man would be? Strange. So men have it easier than women, because they don't have to conform to ridiculous ideological strictures?
"The Nuremberg Rally didn't represent Nazism"
It's not immune. It just takes actual proof, actual changes in behavior, not just "I'm not like them!"
In men, they look for socialists.
No, I asked you a very simple question, which you couldn't answer. Even assuming that the idiots showing up there (1) knew Donna Hylton (2) knew what she had done (3) knew that she would be speaking AND (4) approved of it, how does their presence say anything about the rest of them that did not show up?
Eh, here's suspecting that you'll be saying: "IT'S A PLOT TO MAKE US THINK THEY'RE OK WHEN THEY'RE NOT!"
What do you think of Finland and Denmark having female PMs who abolished all coronavirus rules? A plot to kill you?
Is there anything you say that is actually based on evidence?
Because they're still allied with that ideology after it?
Pretty much.
I think it's a largely economic move, their economy probably couldn't handle a longer period of restrictions.
Even their economic reporters are left-wing lunatics.
Why are you still allied with hating women after Marc Lepine?
So 'the economy' could handle a 2 year lockdown intended to kill you, but far less damaging rules aimed at the unvaccinated (intended to kill you, of course) was something it could not handle.
Makes perfect sense. At least have a better excuse, like "these female leaders know men are more likely to die from Covid so this is their plan to kill us".