You sound almost like their apologist. You might have an argument if I said "women want genocide" but I said feminists. This isn't even something you can dispute. They fucking said it. Multiple times.
OK, then substantiate your generalization that "feminists want" to see men die.
No, because that's just an absurd response.
Your problem is that you're just a tad bit bad at reasoning. If the fact that you can find a few feminists who want to see men die proves something about every single feminist, because they are feminists, then the fact that they are male, female, then human, then mammals, then eukaryotes would prove thee same thing about those groups.
Because women who are left wing have a far deeper hatred of men by virtue of not being one.
I don't disagree with this, as something true most of the time, but your earlier proof was to cite that this is somethihng every single journalist believes.
A million of them turned up to listen to Donna Hylton, a convicted torturer and murderer?
I don't believe their idiotic deflections. That's all. It's like the ConPro cuckolds who go on about muh joos but the Holocaust didn't happen, but they wish it did and if it had, it should have.
I said that a woman wouldn't be hired without being one.
You sound almost like their apologist. You might have an argument if I said "women want genocide" but I said feminists. This isn't even something you can dispute. They fucking said it. Multiple times.
No, the topic of the conversation was my comment.
That's a ridiculous circular logic.
Yes, you always say that when you're called out for making stuff up. I don't see the need to make stuff up. You do.
And dolphins do as well, because "MAMMALS FUCKING SAID IT". See the problem?
No... you made it about 'female journalists' when as even you admitted, all your claims applied equally well to journalists as whole.
Didn't expect you to be able to follow it. But there is nothing circular about it. Read it again.
I'm not making anything up.
No, because that's just an absurd response.
Because women who are left wing have a far deeper hatred of men by virtue of not being one.
OK, then substantiate your generalization that "feminists want" to see men die.
Your problem is that you're just a tad bit bad at reasoning. If the fact that you can find a few feminists who want to see men die proves something about every single feminist, because they are feminists, then the fact that they are male, female, then human, then mammals, then eukaryotes would prove thee same thing about those groups.
I don't disagree with this, as something true most of the time, but your earlier proof was to cite that this is somethihng every single journalist believes.
A million of them turned up to listen to Donna Hylton, a convicted torturer and murderer?
I don't believe their idiotic deflections. That's all. It's like the ConPro cuckolds who go on about muh joos but the Holocaust didn't happen, but they wish it did and if it had, it should have.
I said that a woman wouldn't be hired without being one.