I thought it's pretty well established that the establishment screams 'misinformation' when confronted with inconvenient truths, and that its own lies are never called 'misinformation'.
The conflict of interest is that as a feminist woman, she has a desire to see men die.
She does? Based on what?
Why the fuck would we trust her to tell the truth? Anything by a female author about More Feminine Flu or the vax, when you read it, remember that top line.
I'm just amazed that you're limiting this to 'female authors' and about this subject. Presumably, all the rest of the media is just fine.
And before you say not all women are feminists - nobody without those opinions will get hired as a journalist.
Well, you do have a knack for making stuff up and then saying that this is what others want.
Because that's the topic of conversation.
No, that's what you made the topic of conversation.
If only feminists can be hired as journalists, and all feminists have a "desire to see men die", then clearly you cannot claim that this has to bee a female journalist. Your arguments are not even internally consistent.
What is the conflict of interest?
I thought it's pretty well established that the establishment screams 'misinformation' when confronted with inconvenient truths, and that its own lies are never called 'misinformation'.
She does? Based on what?
I'm just amazed that you're limiting this to 'female authors' and about this subject. Presumably, all the rest of the media is just fine.
You're so, so close. Nobody.
Well, you do have a knack for making stuff up and then saying that this is what others want.
No, that's what you made the topic of conversation.
If only feminists can be hired as journalists, and all feminists have a "desire to see men die", then clearly you cannot claim that this has to bee a female journalist. Your arguments are not even internally consistent.