Fair’s tweet, which has since been deleted, prompted more than 1,000 “vile missives” to be sent to her personal and work inboxes, as well as detailed death threats, including the insertion of an explosive device into her “p—y,” she told The Post on Wednesday in an email. But it also prompted DeGioia to issue a response reiterating the university’s stance on the free exchange of ideas.

“We protect the right of our community members to exercise their freedom of expression,” DeGioia’s statement continued. “This does not mean the University endorses the content of their expression. We can and do strongly condemn the use of violent imagery, profanity, and insensitive labeling of individuals based on gender, ethnicity or political affiliation in any form of discourse. Such expressions go against our values.”

https://archive.fo/0UIxM

This is valuable freedom of expression. But disagreeing with Georgetown's cult beliefs gets you a suspension.

“I am writing to inform you that I have placed Ilya Shapiro on administrative leave, pending an investigation into whether he violated our policies and expectations on professional conduct, non-discrimination, and anti-harassment, the results of which will inform our next steps,” William M. Treanor, dean and executive vice president of the Georgetown University Law Center, wrote in an email to the law school community. “Pending the outcome of the investigation, he will remain on leave and not be on campus. This investigation will follow the procedures established by Georgetown University.”

https://archive.is/iTdO2

These lowlifes of Georgetown should spend the rest of their empty, miserable lives in prison.

When asked Wednesday if Fair remained employed by the university, a spokesman referred The Post to a portion of DeGioia’s statement that read: “If comments made by faculty members are determined to substantially affect their teaching, research, or University service, we will address them through established University procedures outlined in our Georgetown University Faculty Handbook.”

What a simple and honest answer to a straightforward yes or no question. Surely an indication that they're being honest about the rest of this matter as well, like the "vile missives".

“I set this up for Tucker Carlson,” she said. “He proved my experiment.”

This is such typical circular bullshit. Just more "opposition to feminism proves the need for feminism."

“I aim to create language that creates as much discomfort as I am forced to feel in this regime,” she told the Washington Post. “I cannot tell you the rage and hurt it feels as all of those men on that Judiciary Committee kicked sexual assault survivors in the gut.”

If the goal was to elicit "discomfort" then I suspect this was a massive failure. People aren't uncomfortable, they just want her held accountable in the same way a conservative would be.

Only acceptable responce: Back at ya, feminist swine.

I for one would love it if feminists went around killing men. The more men we kill the better.

So, woman talks how women do in private. Who's surprised, really?