Only relevant information is shared with your consent
Watch that morph into "Unless the Australian security services can demonstrate a pressing need \ are bored or unless this information could possibly be used in the resolution of a crime. Any crime, any where. Including making sure your taxes are paid properly - i.e., all of your information shared with all of the government, all of the time."
Your vaccine status is relevant, and needs to be confirmed prior to some purchases. We find that preventing people from accessing various digital services increases compliance rate, which is good for everyone.
It's also relevant you register your digital ID with social media, since anonymous usage is too dangerous, and people need to be held responsible for misinformation, hate speech, or criticizing the government.
Companies share information on undesired behavior so providers like Microsoft can ban you before you're able to say dangerous speech on their platforms.
This information is also used to produce a credit score. The IMF was correct that this information is useful to determine if someone should be provided a loan. Loans are reported, along with a citizen ID number to the government, and relevant information. This ensures equity, by increasing a company's ESG score if they do more business with those with a high credit rating. They're free to provide services to those with a low credit rating, but it does decrease the company's score, and a low score could indicate that a company may need to be investigated and publicly shamed for supporting dangerous views.
Phones are often required to log in to services, as it provides two-factor authentication, and it makes log in easy with face verification. The government provides this service, so companies don't have to invest in their own system.
Since phones now anonymously track what other phones they're near, and registering government ID is required to use a phone, it is only a relevant next step to report to others if they're spending too much time with someone who has a low score, as it can affect their own. Phones could also turn on their microphones. This will be denied, as although it's not wrong, if people know about it before they're ready, it could cause problems with social cohesion. This is relevant because it can help catch criminals, and for the safety of children.
I'm pushing it somewhat, but this much of this has already been talked about (Microsoft, IMF, WEF, UN), is in trial (Mastercard carbon tracking) or is something already done in China.
One of the few places I could find anyone not saying how "wonderful" it all is, and how we should all be "embracing" it, as "early adopters", lolololol...
When even the fucking UN (!!) thinks this is a bad idea (written before the "pandemic", notably), you know you're looking at top notch evil dystopian shit, lol:
Watch that morph into "Unless the Australian security services can demonstrate a pressing need \ are bored or unless this information could possibly be used in the resolution of a crime. Any crime, any where. Including making sure your taxes are paid properly - i.e., all of your information shared with all of the government, all of the time."
Your vaccine status is relevant, and needs to be confirmed prior to some purchases. We find that preventing people from accessing various digital services increases compliance rate, which is good for everyone.
It's also relevant you register your digital ID with social media, since anonymous usage is too dangerous, and people need to be held responsible for misinformation, hate speech, or criticizing the government.
Companies share information on undesired behavior so providers like Microsoft can ban you before you're able to say dangerous speech on their platforms.
This information is also used to produce a credit score. The IMF was correct that this information is useful to determine if someone should be provided a loan. Loans are reported, along with a citizen ID number to the government, and relevant information. This ensures equity, by increasing a company's ESG score if they do more business with those with a high credit rating. They're free to provide services to those with a low credit rating, but it does decrease the company's score, and a low score could indicate that a company may need to be investigated and publicly shamed for supporting dangerous views.
Phones are often required to log in to services, as it provides two-factor authentication, and it makes log in easy with face verification. The government provides this service, so companies don't have to invest in their own system.
Since phones now anonymously track what other phones they're near, and registering government ID is required to use a phone, it is only a relevant next step to report to others if they're spending too much time with someone who has a low score, as it can affect their own. Phones could also turn on their microphones. This will be denied, as although it's not wrong, if people know about it before they're ready, it could cause problems with social cohesion. This is relevant because it can help catch criminals, and for the safety of children.
I'm pushing it somewhat, but this much of this has already been talked about (Microsoft, IMF, WEF, UN), is in trial (Mastercard carbon tracking) or is something already done in China.
CHINESE
VIRUS
CHINESE
SOCIETY
This website looks absolutely nuts, but anyway...
https://ramblinginpen.com/2021/12/16/australians-reject-mygovid-digital-identification-system-mandates-government-dark-state-operations/
One of the few places I could find anyone not saying how "wonderful" it all is, and how we should all be "embracing" it, as "early adopters", lolololol...
When even the fucking UN (!!) thinks this is a bad idea (written before the "pandemic", notably), you know you're looking at top notch evil dystopian shit, lol:
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25156
This actually happened last year around May or so.
It's handy to have to show to people when they ask "where's this leading" you can just show them the website.