The problem is that leftoids are purely materialistic, and are unable to identify the problem let alone come up with solutions. The best they can do is "uhh people work too much for le 1% or something. They should work less for poor people. I guess". They are unable to express the existential discontentment and spiritual hollowness of being a wage cuck. They even misunderstand Office Space they talked about. The characters in there weren't miserable because "they worked too much", most of the movie was about how they don't do shit all the time basically. The movie literally ends with the programmer getting a blue collar job in which he is more satisfied because the work he does is more tangible and fulfilling. But that dimension is invisible to the commies. They vaguely brush up against it with their delusional "well I want to be a philosophy teacher in the commune" but it never really escapes the materialist analysis.
The left understands the fulfillment aspect to an extent, but a major problem is that their go-to solution to problems is to just throw more impersonal bureaucracy and procedure at it. And a lot of the problems they identify seem to be caused by bureaucracy and procedure they wanted (and presumably assumed they'd be able to manipulate to their own ends) takes on an agenda of its own counter to theirs.
So their "solutions" do nothing but exacerbate the problem.
The problem is that leftoids are purely materialistic, and are unable to identify the problem let alone come up with solutions. The best they can do is "uhh people work too much for le 1% or something. They should work less for poor people. I guess". They are unable to express the existential discontentment and spiritual hollowness of being a wage cuck. They even misunderstand Office Space they talked about. The characters in there weren't miserable because "they worked too much", most of the movie was about how they don't do shit all the time basically. The movie literally ends with the programmer getting a blue collar job in which he is more satisfied because the work he does is more tangible and fulfilling. But that dimension is invisible to the commies. They vaguely brush up against it with their delusional "well I want to be a philosophy teacher in the commune" but it never really escapes the materialist analysis.
The left understands the fulfillment aspect to an extent, but a major problem is that their go-to solution to problems is to just throw more impersonal bureaucracy and procedure at it. And a lot of the problems they identify seem to be caused by bureaucracy and procedure they wanted (and presumably assumed they'd be able to manipulate to their own ends) takes on an agenda of its own counter to theirs.
So their "solutions" do nothing but exacerbate the problem.
no the movie literally ends with the stapler guy on an island
Office Space was not the story of Milton; it was the story of Peter.